Chanda Jagannath, Ionov Leonid, Kirillova Alina, Synytska Alla
Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research e.V. Dresden, Hohe Str. 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany and Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Soft Matter. 2015 Dec 21;11(47):9126-34. doi: 10.1039/c5sm02143j.
Icing is an important problem, which often leads to emergency situations in northern countries. The reduction of icing requires a detailed understanding of this process. In this work, we report on a systematic investigation of the effects of geometry and chemical properties of surfaces on the formation of an ice layer, its properties, and thawing. We compare in detail icing and ice thawing on flat and rough hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. We also show advantages and disadvantages of the surfaces of each kind. We demonstrate that water condenses in a liquid form, leading to the formation of a thin continuous water layer on a hydrophilic surface. Meanwhile, separated rounded water droplets are formed on hydrophobic surfaces. As a result of slower heat exchange, the freezing of rounded water droplets on a hydrophobic surface occurs later than the freezing of the continuous water layer on a hydrophilic one. Moreover, growth of ice on hydrophobic surfaces is slower than on the hydrophilic ones, because ice grows due to the condensation of water vapor on already formed ice crystals, and not due to the condensation on the polymer surface. Rough hydrophobic surfaces also demonstrate a very low ice adhesion value, which is because of the reduced contact area with ice. The main disadvantage of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces is the pinning of water droplets on them after thawing. Flat hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol)-modified surfaces also exhibit very low ice adhesion, which is due to the very low freezing point of the water-poly(ethylene glycol) mixtures. Water easily leaves from flat hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol)-modified surfaces, and they quickly become dry. However, the ice growth rate on poly(ethylene glycol)-modified hydrophilic surfaces is the highest. These results indicate that neither purely (super)hydrophobic polymeric surfaces, nor "antifreeze" hydrophilic ones provide an ideal solution to the problem of icing.
结冰是一个重要问题,在北方国家常常引发紧急情况。减少结冰需要对这一过程有详细的了解。在这项工作中,我们报告了对表面的几何形状和化学性质对冰层形成、其性质及融化的影响的系统研究。我们详细比较了平坦和粗糙的亲水及疏水表面上的结冰和融冰情况。我们还展示了每种表面的优缺点。我们证明水以液态凝结,导致在亲水表面形成一层薄的连续水层。与此同时,在疏水表面形成分离的圆形水滴。由于热交换较慢,疏水表面上圆形水滴的冻结比亲水表面上连续水层的冻结发生得更晚。此外,疏水表面上冰的生长比亲水表面上的慢,因为冰是由于水蒸气在已形成的冰晶上凝结而生长,而不是由于在聚合物表面的凝结。粗糙的疏水表面也显示出非常低的冰附着力值,这是因为与冰的接触面积减小。疏水和超疏水表面的主要缺点是解冻后水滴会滞留在上面。平坦的亲水聚乙二醇改性表面也表现出非常低的冰附着力,这是由于水 - 聚乙二醇混合物的冰点非常低。水很容易从平坦的亲水聚乙二醇改性表面离开,并且它们很快变干。然而,聚乙二醇改性亲水表面上的冰生长速率是最高的。这些结果表明,无论是纯粹的(超)疏水聚合物表面,还是“防冻”亲水表面,都不能为结冰问题提供理想的解决方案。