Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰的检测与管理

The detection and management of diabetes distress in people with type 1 diabetes.

作者信息

Sturt Jackie, Dennick Kathryn, Due-Christensen Mette, McCarthy Kate

机构信息

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Rd, SE18WA, London, UK.

Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Centre, Niels Steensens Vej 8, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Nov;15(11):101. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0660-z.

Abstract

Diabetes distress (DD) represents a significant clinical burden in which levels of DD are related to both glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and some self-management behaviours. DD is related to, but different from, depression. Differences in DD experienced in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have been observed. Commonly measured using the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), rates of elevated DD in research study participants range from 20 to 30 %. Risk factors for elevated DD in type 1 diabetes are longer duration of diabetes, severe hypoglycaemia, younger age and being female. A systematic review of intervention studies assessing DD identified eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and nine pre-post design studies. Only three studies targeted DD with the intervention. Intervention types were diabetes self-management education (DSME), psychologically informed self-management and devices. DSME pre-post studies, namely the Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) programme, produced more consistent improvements in DD and HbA1c at follow-up. Psychologically informed self-management was more heterogeneous, but several RCTs were effective in reducing DD. Group interventions offered the greatest benefits across intervention designs.

摘要

糖尿病困扰(DD)是一项重大的临床负担,其中DD水平与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)及一些自我管理行为均相关。DD与抑郁症相关,但又有所不同。已观察到1型和2型糖尿病患者所经历的DD存在差异。通常使用糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID)和糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)进行测量,研究参与者中DD升高的比例在20%至30%之间。1型糖尿病中DD升高的危险因素包括糖尿病病程较长、严重低血糖、年龄较小以及女性。一项评估DD的干预研究的系统评价确定了8项随机对照试验(RCT)和9项前后设计研究。只有3项研究针对DD进行干预。干预类型包括糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)、心理指导自我管理和设备。DSME前后研究,即正常饮食剂量调整(DAFNE)计划,在随访时对DD和HbA1c产生了更一致的改善。心理指导自我管理则更为多样化,但有几项RCT在降低DD方面是有效的。在各种干预设计中,团体干预带来的益处最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验