Al-Harbi Fahad A, Ayad Neveen M, Khan Zahid A, Mahrous Amr A, Morgano Steven M
Associate Professor, Substitutive Dental Sciences Department, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Associate Professor, Restorative Dental Sciences Department, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; and Assistant Professor, Dental Biomaterials Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jan;115(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Durability of the bond between different core materials and zirconia retainers is an important predictor of the success of a dental prosthesis. Nevertheless, because of its polycrystalline structure, zirconia cannot be etched and bonded to a conventional resin cement.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of 3 metal primer/resin cement systems on the shear bond strength (SBS) of 3 core materials bonded to yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) ceramic retainers.
Zirconia ceramic (Cercon) disks (5×3 mm) were airborne-particle abraded, rinsed, and air-dried. Disk-shaped core specimens (7×7 mm) that were prepared of composite resin, Ni-Cr, and zirconia were bonded to the zirconia ceramic disks by using one of 3 metal primer/cement systems: (Z-Prime Plus/BisCem, Zirconia Primer/Multilink Automix, or Clearfil Ceramic Primer/Clearfil SA). SBS was tested in a universal testing machine. Stereomicroscopy was used to evaluate the failure mode of debonded specimens. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis using the Scheffe procedure (α=.05).
Clearfil SA/Clearfil Ceramic Primer system with an Ni-Cr core yielded the highest SBS value (19.03 MPa), whereas the lowest SBS value was obtained when Multilink Automix/Zirconia Primer system was used with the zirconia core group (4.09 MPa). Differences in mean SBS values among the cement/primer groups were statistically significant, except for Clearfil SA and BisCem with both composite resin and zirconia cores. Differences in mean SBS values among the core subgroups were not statistically significant, except for zirconia core with BisCem, Multilink, and Clearfil SA. The predominant failure mode was adhesive, except for Clearfil SA and BisCem luting agents with composite resin cores, which displayed cohesive failure, and Multilink Automix with a composite resin, core as well as Clearfil SA with Ni-Cr cores, where the debonded specimens of each group displayed a mixed (adhesive/cohesive) failure pattern.
Use of the Clearfil SA/Clearfil Ceramic Primer system, based on methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP), increased the bond strength of Y-TZP ceramics to core materials.
不同核材料与氧化锆固位体之间粘结的耐久性是牙科修复体成功的重要预测指标。然而,由于其多晶结构,氧化锆无法被蚀刻并与传统树脂水门汀粘结。
本体外研究的目的是比较3种金属底漆/树脂水门汀系统对3种核材料与钇稳定四方多晶氧化锆(Y-TZP)陶瓷固位体之间剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。
将氧化锆陶瓷(Cercon)圆盘(5×3mm)进行空气颗粒喷砂处理、冲洗并风干。由复合树脂、镍铬合金和氧化锆制备的圆盘形核标本(7×7mm)通过3种金属底漆/水门汀系统之一粘结到氧化锆陶瓷圆盘上:(Z-Prime Plus/BisCem、氧化锆底漆/Multilink Automix或Clearfil Ceramic Primer/Clearfil SA)。在万能试验机上测试SBS。使用体视显微镜评估脱粘标本的失效模式。数据采用双向方差分析,并使用Scheffe程序进行事后分析(α=0.05)。
使用含镍铬合金核的Clearfil SA/Clearfil Ceramic Primer系统时获得最高的SBS值(19.03MPa),而当Multilink Automix/氧化锆底漆系统用于氧化锆核组时获得最低的SBS值(4.09MPa)。除了Clearfil SA和BisCem与复合树脂核和氧化锆核搭配时,水门汀/底漆组之间平均SBS值的差异具有统计学意义。核亚组之间平均SBS值的差异无统计学意义,除了BisCem、Multilink和Clearfil SA与氧化锆核搭配时。主要的失效模式是粘结性的,除了Clearfil SA和BisCem粘结剂与复合树脂核搭配时显示内聚性失效,以及Multilink Automix与复合树脂核搭配以及Clearfil SA与镍铬合金核搭配时,每组的脱粘标本显示混合(粘结性/内聚性)失效模式。
基于甲基丙烯酰氧基癸基二氢磷酸酯(MDP)的Clearfil SA/Clearfil Ceramic Primer系统的使用提高了Y-TZP陶瓷与核材料之间的粘结强度。