Onederra Italo A, Furtney Jason K, Sellers Ewan, Iverson Stephen
The University of Queensland, WH Bryan Mining and Geology Research Centre, Australia.
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci (1997). 2013 Feb;58:73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.10.004.
This paper presents one of the latest developments in the blasting engineering modelling field-the Hybrid Stress Blasting Model (HSBM). HSBM includes a rock breakage engine to model detonation, wave propagation, rock fragmentation, and muck pile formation. Results from two controlled blasting experiments were used to evaluate the code's ability to predict the extent of damage. Results indicate that the code is capable of adequately predicting both the extent and shape of the damage zone associated with the influence of point-of-initiation and free-face boundary conditions. Radial fractures extending towards a free face are apparent in the modelling output and matched those mapped after the experiment. In the stage 2 validation experiment, the maximum extent of visible damage was of the order of 1.45 m for the fully coupled 38-mm emulsion charge. Peak radial velocities were predicted within a relative difference of only 1.59% at the nearest history point at 0.3 m from the explosive charge. Discrepancies were larger further away from the charge, with relative differences of -22.4% and -42.9% at distances of 0.46 m and 0.61 m, respectively, meaning that the model overestimated particle velocities at these distances. This attenuation deficiency in the modelling produced an overestimation of the damage zone at the corner of the block due to excessive stress reflections. The extent of visible damage in the immediate vicinity of the blasthole adequately matched the measurements.
本文介绍了爆破工程建模领域的最新进展之一——混合应力爆破模型(HSBM)。HSBM包含一个岩石破碎引擎,用于模拟爆轰、波传播、岩石破碎和碴堆形成。通过两个控制爆破实验的结果来评估该代码预测破坏程度的能力。结果表明,该代码能够充分预测与起爆点和自由面边界条件影响相关的破坏区域的范围和形状。在建模输出中,向自由面延伸的径向裂缝很明显,并且与实验后绘制的裂缝相匹配。在第二阶段验证实验中,对于完全耦合的38毫米乳化炸药,可见破坏的最大范围约为1.45米。在距炸药装药0.3米处的最近历史点,预测的峰值径向速度的相对差异仅为1.59%。在离装药更远的地方差异更大,在0.46米和0.61米处的相对差异分别为-22.4%和-42.9%,这意味着该模型在这些距离处高估了粒子速度。建模中的这种衰减不足由于过度的应力反射导致在块体角落处的破坏区域被高估。炮孔紧邻区域内可见破坏的范围与测量结果充分匹配。