• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业水系统的生态效率:中观尺度的方法学方法与评估。

Eco-efficiency of agricultural water systems: Methodological approach and assessment at meso-level scale.

机构信息

CIHEAM - Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Vie Ceglie 9, Valenzano, BA, Italy.

CIHEAM - Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Vie Ceglie 9, Valenzano, BA, Italy.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2016 Jan 1;165:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.011
PMID:26413800
Abstract

This study presents a methodological framework for the meso-level eco-efficiency assessment of agricultural water systems using a life-cycle system-based approach. The methodology was applied to the Sinistra Ofanto irrigation scheme, located in Southern Italy, where about 28,165 ha are under irrigation. The environmental performance of the system was evaluated through a set of selected mid-point environmental impact categories while the economic performance was measured using the total value added to the system's final products due to water use and the adopted management practices. Both economic performance and environmental performance were measured at different stages and for each stakeholder in the value chain. A distinction was made between foreground and background systems referring, respectively, to the processes that occurred inside the water system boundaries and those used for the production of supplementary resources. The analysis revealed that the major environmental burdens are: i) the freshwater resource depletion (i.e. excessive groundwater pumping), ii) climate change (i.e. direct emissions due to fertilizer use and diesel combustion), and iii) eutrophication (as a result of excessive application of N and P fertilizers). A considerable impact was observed on the background system where energy, fuel and agrochemicals were produced thereby confirming the prominent role of background processes in the comprehensive eco-efficiency assessment. The presented methodology aimed at the quantitative assessment of the eco-efficiency level rather than at the identification of the most affected environmental category. Hence, the results can be used to compare the performance of the system from one year to the next, among different stakeholders (water users) and/or to assess the impact of adopting innovative technologies and management practices. Moreover, the presented approach is useful for comparing the performance among different agricultural water systems and also in respect to other meso-level water systems in a cross-sectorial analysis.

摘要

本研究提出了一种基于生命周期系统方法的中观生态效率评估方法,用于评估农业水系统。该方法应用于位于意大利南部的 Sinistra Ofanto 灌溉系统,该系统约有 28165 公顷土地用于灌溉。通过一组选定的中点环境影响类别评估系统的环境绩效,同时使用由于水的使用和采用的管理实践而导致系统最终产品的增加值来衡量经济绩效。经济绩效和环境绩效均在价值链的不同阶段和每个利益相关者进行衡量。根据参考的分别是在水系统边界内发生的过程和用于生产补充资源的过程,区分了前景点和背景系统。分析表明,主要的环境负担是:i)淡水资源枯竭(即过度抽取地下水),ii)气候变化(即由于肥料使用和柴油燃烧导致的直接排放),iii)富营养化(由于过量施用 N 和 P 肥料)。在生产能源、燃料和农用化学品的背景系统中观察到相当大的影响,从而证实了背景过程在综合生态效率评估中的突出作用。所提出的方法旨在定量评估生态效率水平,而不是确定受影响最严重的环境类别。因此,这些结果可用于比较系统在不同年份、不同利益相关者(用水户)之间的绩效,或评估采用创新技术和管理实践的影响。此外,所提出的方法有助于比较不同农业水系统之间的绩效,也有助于在跨部门分析中比较其他中观水系统之间的绩效。

相似文献

1
Eco-efficiency of agricultural water systems: Methodological approach and assessment at meso-level scale.农业水系统的生态效率:中观尺度的方法学方法与评估。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Jan 1;165:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
2
A GIS policy approach for assessing the effect of fertilizers on the quality of drinking and irrigation water and wellhead protection zones (Crete, Greece).一种用于评估肥料对饮用水和灌溉水质量以及井口保护区域(希腊克里特岛)影响的地理信息系统政策方法。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Mar 15;189:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.038. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?有机农产品和传统农产品的环境影响——生命周期评估能否捕捉到这些差异?
J Environ Manage. 2015 Feb 1;149:193-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
4
Environmental impact of rice production based on nitrogen fertilizer use.基于氮肥使用的水稻生产的环境影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(16):15885-15895. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1788-6. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Impact of a transformation from flood to drip irrigation on groundwater recharge and nitrogen leaching under variable climatic conditions.在气候变化条件下,从漫灌转变为滴灌对地下水补给和氮素淋失的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 15;825:153805. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153805. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
6
The influence of fertiliser and pesticide emissions model on life cycle assessment of agricultural products: The case of Danish and Italian barley.肥料和农药排放模型对农产品生命周期评估的影响:以丹麦和意大利大麦为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Aug 15;592:745-757. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.183. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
7
Life cycle assessment of rice production systems in different paddy field size levels in north of Iran.伊朗北部不同稻田规模水平下水稻生产系统的生命周期评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Mar 2;191(4):202. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7344-0.
8
Measurement and modeling of phosphorous transport in shallow groundwater environments.浅层地下水环境中磷迁移的测量与建模
J Contam Hydrol. 2014 Aug;164:125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 16.
9
[Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment on Different Modes of Greenhouse Vegetable Production in the North China Plain].[华北平原不同模式温室蔬菜生产的生命周期环境影响评估]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2018 May 8;39(5):2480-2488. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201710007.
10
Environmental profile of paddy rice cultivation with different straw management.不同秸秆管理方式下水稻种植的环境概况。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Oct 1;494-495:119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.126. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Promotion Potential for Agricultural Eco-Efficiency-Evidence of Pollution's Strong Disposability.农业生态效率的空间分异与提升潜力分析——污染强排放的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2397. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032397.
2
Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Response and Its Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Rural Population Outflowing: A Case Study in Qinan County, China.从农村人口外流角度看农业生态效率响应及其影响因素:以中国秦安县为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):1016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021016.
3
Evaluating the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Alongside China's Carbon Neutrality Targets.
评估中国碳中和目标下农业生态效率的时空特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 22;19(23):15478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315478.
4
How Much Is the Eco-Efficiency of Agricultural Production in West China? Evidence from the Village Level Data.中国西部农业生产的生态效率是多少?来自村级数据的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(11):4049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114049.