• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

11 年间强制性社区治疗决定因素的变化。基于人群的精神卫生数据库关联分析。

Changes in determinants of compulsory community treatment over 11 years. A population-based analysis of linked mental health databases.

机构信息

University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Level 4, Building 1, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia; Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Health, Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 15;230(2):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.027
PMID:26416586
Abstract

Differences in patient characteristics, legislation and service setting may explain variations in the reported efficacy of compulsory treatment orders (CTOs). Our objective was to investigate factors associated with CTO placement in Western Australia and see if there were any changes over the 11 years following their introduction. We used three linked Western Australian databases to compare 2958 patients on community treatment orders with an equal number of controls matched on age, sex and diagnosis, as well as 2832 consecutive controls selected on date of discharge from inpatient care or CTO placement. Multivariate analyses were used to further examine potential predictors of a CTO. The incidence of CTOs, and the characteristics of patients placed on these orders, showed little change over 11 years. They tended to be younger and male with schizophrenia or other non-affective psychotic disorders. Previous health service use as an inpatient or outpatient also predicted compulsory community treatment. Psychiatrists in Western Australia appear to be applying community treatment orders to similar types of patient as elsewhere, but unlike other jurisdictions, use has not increased. We need further research to establish the relative contribution of patient characteristics, legislation and service setting toward the use and outcome of CTOs.

摘要

患者特征、立法和服务环境的差异可能解释了强制治疗令(CTO)报告疗效的差异。我们的目的是调查与西澳大利亚 CTO 安置相关的因素,并观察在引入 CTO 后的 11 年内是否有任何变化。我们使用三个链接的西澳大利亚数据库,将 2958 名接受社区治疗令的患者与年龄、性别和诊断相匹配的 2832 名连续对照患者进行比较,以及 2832 名连续对照患者按住院或 CTO 安置出院日期选择。多变量分析用于进一步检查 CTO 的潜在预测因素。在 11 年内,CTO 的发生率以及接受这些命令的患者的特征几乎没有变化。他们往往更年轻,是男性,患有精神分裂症或其他非情感性精神病障碍。以前作为住院患者或门诊患者的卫生服务使用情况也预测了强制性社区治疗。西澳大利亚的精神科医生似乎将社区治疗令应用于与其他地方类似的患者,但与其他司法管辖区不同,使用量并未增加。我们需要进一步的研究来确定患者特征、立法和服务环境对 CTO 的使用和结果的相对贡献。

相似文献

1
Changes in determinants of compulsory community treatment over 11 years. A population-based analysis of linked mental health databases.11 年间强制性社区治疗决定因素的变化。基于人群的精神卫生数据库关联分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 15;230(2):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
2
What determines compulsory community treatment? A logistic regression analysis using linked mental health and offender databases.是什么决定了强制社区治疗?一项使用关联心理健康和罪犯数据库的逻辑回归分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;38(8):613-8. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01429.x.
3
Community treatment orders in Western Switzerland: A retrospective epidemiological study.瑞士西部的社区治疗令:一项回顾性流行病学研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Nov-Dec;67:101509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101509. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
An eleven-year evaluation of the effect of community treatment orders on changes in mental health service use.社区治疗令对精神卫生服务使用变化影响的十一年评估。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 May;47(5):650-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? - The experience of Western Australia and Nova Scotia.流行病学研究能否协助评估社区治疗令?——西澳大利亚州和新斯科舍省的经验。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
6
Impact of compulsory community treatment on admission rates: survival analysis using linked mental health and offender databases.强制社区治疗对住院率的影响:使用关联的心理健康与罪犯数据库进行生存分析
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 May;184:432-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.184.5.432.
7
The effect of community treatment orders on outcome as assessed by the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales.社区治疗令对国民健康结果量表评估的结果的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Mar 30;215(3):574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.036. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
8
Cultural and linguistic diversity increases the likelihood of compulsory community treatment.文化和语言的多样性增加了强制社区治疗的可能性。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Assessing the outcome of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: epidemiological study in Western Australia.评估社区强制精神治疗的效果:西澳大利亚的流行病学研究
BMJ. 2002 May 25;324(7348):1244. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1244.
10
A comparison of health service use in two jurisdictions with and without compulsory community treatment.两个司法管辖区内接受和未接受强制社区治疗情况下的医疗服务使用情况比较。
Psychol Med. 2005 Sep;35(9):1357-67. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705004824.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations between, and within, jurisdictions in the use of community treatment orders and other compulsory community treatment: study of 402 060 people across four Australian states.不同司法管辖区之间以及辖区内部在使用社区治疗令和其他强制性社区治疗方面的差异:对澳大利亚四个州的402060人进行的研究。
BJPsych Open. 2025 Mar 21;11(2):e57. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.23.
2
Participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program by people with severe mental illness, Australia, 2006-2019: a national data linkage study.2006 - 2019年澳大利亚重度精神疾病患者参与国家肠癌筛查计划:一项全国性数据关联研究
Med J Aust. 2024 Dec 9;221(11):617-622. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52521. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Benefits following community treatment orders have an inverse relationship with rates of use: meta-analysis and meta-regression.
社区治疗令后的益处与使用率呈负相关:荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Apr 14;9(3):e68. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.28.
4
Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order.挪威基于能力的精神卫生立法增强自主权:一项关于患者从社区治疗令中康复的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07892-9.