School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
The Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
J Exp Bot. 2016 Jan;67(1):15-30. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv437. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Physiological aspects of acidity stress in plants (synonymous with H(+) rhizotoxicity or low-pH stress) have long been a focus of research, in particular with respect to acidic soils where aluminium and H(+) rhizotoxicities often co-occur. However, toxic H(+) and Al(3+) elicit different response mechanisms in plants, and it is important to consider their effects separately. The primary aim of this review was to provide the current state of knowledge regarding the genetics of the specific reactions to low-pH stress in growing plants. A comparison of the results gleaned from quantitative trait loci analysis and global transcriptome profiling of plants in response to high proton concentrations revealed a two-stage genetic response: (i) in the short-term, proton pump H(+)-ATPases present the first barrier in root cells, allocating an excess of H(+) into either the apoplast or vacuole; the ensuing defence signaling system involves auxin, salicylic acid, and methyl jasmonate, which subsequently initiate expression of STOP and DREB transcription factors as well as chaperone ROF; (2) the long-term response includes other genes, such as alternative oxidase and type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, which act to detoxify dangerous reactive oxygen species in mitochondria, and help plants better manage the stress. A range of transporter genes including those for nitrate (NTR1), malate (ALMT1), and heavy metals are often up-regulated by H(+) rhizotoxicity. Expansins, cell-wall-related genes, the γ-aminobutyric acid shunt and biochemical pH-stat genes also reflect changes in cell metabolism and biochemistry in acidic conditions. However, the genetics underlying the acidity stress response of plants is complicated and only fragmentally understood.
植物酸胁迫(亦称 H(+)根毒性或低 pH 胁迫)的生理学方面一直是研究的重点,特别是在酸性土壤中,铝和 H(+)根毒性通常同时存在。然而,有毒的 H(+)和 Al(3+)在植物中引发不同的反应机制,因此分开考虑它们的影响很重要。本综述的主要目的是提供有关生长植物对低 pH 胁迫特定反应的遗传学的最新知识状态。通过对植物在高质子浓度下的数量性状位点分析和全转录组分析结果进行比较,揭示了一个两阶段的遗传反应:(i)在短期内,质子泵 H(+)-ATPases 是根细胞中的第一道屏障,将过量的 H(+)分配到质外体或液泡中;随后的防御信号系统涉及生长素、水杨酸和茉莉酸甲酯,它们随后启动 STOP 和 DREB 转录因子以及伴侣蛋白 ROF 的表达;(ii)长期反应包括其他基因,如替代氧化酶和 II 型 NAD(P)H 脱氢酶,它们有助于解毒线粒体中危险的活性氧,并帮助植物更好地应对胁迫。一系列转运蛋白基因,包括硝酸盐(NTR1)、苹果酸(ALMT1)和重金属转运蛋白基因,通常受到 H(+)根毒性的上调。扩展蛋白、细胞壁相关基因、γ-氨基丁酸分流和生化 pH 平衡基因也反映了细胞代谢和在酸性条件下的生物化学变化。然而,植物酸胁迫反应的遗传学是复杂的,目前只是部分理解。