• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AO/ASIF肱骨干骨折分类的可重复性评估。

Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures.

作者信息

Pignataro Gustavo Soriano, Junqueira André Elias, Matsunaga Fabio Teruo, Matsumoto Marcelo Hide, Belloti João Carlos, Tamaoki Marcel Jun Sugawara

机构信息

Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Jul 26;50(4):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.07.003. eCollection 2015 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.rboe.2015.07.003
PMID:26417565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4563077/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reproducibility of the AO/Asif classification for humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

Consecutive radiographs of the arm in both anteroposterior and lateral view from 60 patients with humeral shaft fractures were analyzed. Six observers who were familiar with the AO/Asif classification (three shoulder and elbow surgery specialists and three general orthopedists) were selected to make the analysis, which was done at three different times. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The intra and interobserver concordance was statistically significant in all the analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

All the evaluators showed concordance between the three evaluations that was considered to be statistically significant. However, the highest values were found among the specialists.

摘要

目的

评估AO/Asif肱骨干骨折分类的可重复性。

方法

分析60例肱骨干骨折患者手臂前后位和侧位的连续X线片。选择6名熟悉AO/Asif分类的观察者(3名肩肘外科专家和3名普通骨科医生)进行分析,分析在三个不同时间进行。使用kappa系数对数据进行统计分析。

结果

在所有分析中,观察者内和观察者间的一致性具有统计学意义。

结论

所有评估者在三次评估之间均表现出具有统计学意义的一致性。然而,专家之间的一致性值最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/e56a63052c93/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/f4b1436a6cf3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/5f4819207c9d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/e56a63052c93/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/f4b1436a6cf3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/5f4819207c9d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dee/4563077/e56a63052c93/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures.AO/ASIF肱骨干骨折分类的可重复性评估。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Jul 26;50(4):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.07.003. eCollection 2015 Jul-Aug.
2
Reproducibility of the AO/ASIF and Gartland classifications for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.儿童肱骨髁上骨折的AO/ASIF和加特兰分类法的可重复性
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 May 28;50(3):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.05.001. eCollection 2015 May-Jun.
3
Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.肱骨骨干骨折OTA/AO分类的可靠性和可重复性
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Mar;31(3):e75-e80. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000738.
4
Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.肱骨近端骨折的分类和特征的观察者间可靠性:二维和三维 CT 的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1600-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00586.
5
Reproducibility of the Tronzo and AO classifications for transtrochanteric fractures.转子间骨折的Tronzo和AO分类的可重复性
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Aug 15;50(5):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.08.002. eCollection 2015 Sep-Oct.
6
Proximal third humeral shaft fractures -- a fracture entity not fully characterized by conventional AO classification.肱骨近端三分之一骨干骨折——一种传统AO分类未完全描述的骨折类型。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
7
Repruducibility of tronzo and ao/asif classifications for transtrochanteric fractures.转子间骨折的Tronzo和AO/Asif分类的可重复性
Acta Ortop Bras. 2014;22(5):275-7. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522014220500884.
8
Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.评估AO/ASIF胫骨远端骨折分类法
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Oct;11(7):477-83. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199710000-00004.
9
Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value.肱骨近端骨折分类的可重复性差。额外的CT价值不大。
Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Jun;68(3):239-42. doi: 10.3109/17453679708996692.
10
Comparison between two classifications of humeral head fractures: Neer and AO-ASIF.两种肱骨头骨折分类方法的比较:Neer分类法和AO-ASIF分类法。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Dec;77(6):751-7.

引用本文的文献

1
INTRA- AND INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT IN THE AO AND GARNAVOS SYSTEMS FOR DIAPHYSEAL HUMERUS FRACTURE.AO和加尔纳沃斯系统中肱骨干骨折的观察者内及观察者间一致性
Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 Jul-Aug;25(4):159-161. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172504169249.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace.使用功能性支具治疗肱骨干骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Oct;20(9):597-601. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82.
2
Outcome after closed functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures.肱骨干骨折闭合功能治疗后的结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Oct;20(9):591-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000246466.01287.04.
3
Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation.肱骨远端三分之一骨干关节外骨折。功能支具与钢板固定的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88(11):2343-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00334.
4
Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures.肱骨干骨折。401例骨折的流行病学研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Nov;88(11):1469-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17634.
5
The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population.在实行按人头付费制度的人群中,转介至骨科服务的骨折和脱位发生率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):290-7.
6
A review and analysis of 11,000 fractures seen in a private practice of orthopaedic surgery, 1937-1956.对1937年至1956年在一家骨科私人诊所所见的11000例骨折病例的回顾与分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Oct;40-A(5):1169-75.
7
Outcome validation of the AO/OTA fracture classification system.AO/OTA骨折分类系统的结果验证
J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Nov;14(8):534-41. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200011000-00003.
8
Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results.肱骨干骨折的功能治疗:适应证与结果
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 May;11(4):283-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199705000-00011.
9
Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.骨折与脱位汇编。骨科创伤协会编码与分类委员会。
J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10 Suppl 1:v-ix, 1-154.
10
Interobserver variation using the AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures.使用AO/ASIF长骨骨折分类法的观察者间差异。
Injury. 1993 Mar;24(3):163-5. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90282-b.