Salhiyyah Kareem, Forster Rachel, Senanayake Eshan, Abdel-Hadi Mohammed, Booth Andrew, Michaels Jonathan A
Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK, SO16 6YD.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;9(9):CD005262. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005262.pub3.
Intermittent claudication (IC) is a symptom of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pentoxifylline, one of many drugs used to treat IC, acts by decreasing blood viscosity, improving erythrocyte flexibility and promoting microcirculatory flow and tissue oxygen concentration. Many studies have evaluated the efficacy of pentoxifylline in treating individuals with PAD, but results of these studies are variable. This is an update of a review first published in 2012.
To determine the efficacy of pentoxifylline in improving the walking capacity (i.e. pain-free walking distance and total (absolute, maximum) walking distance) of individuals with stable intermittent claudication, Fontaine stage II.
For this update, the Cochrane Vascular Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched April 2015) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (2015, Issue 3).
All double-blind, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pentoxifylline versus placebo or any other pharmacological intervention in patients with IC Fontaine stage II.
Two review authors separately assessed included studies,. matched data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Review authors assessed the methodological quality of studies by using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool and collected results related to pain-free walking distance (PFWD) and total walking distance (TWD). Comparison of studies was based on duration and dose of pentoxifylline.
We included in this review 24 studies with 3377 participants. Seventeen studies compared pentoxifylline versus placebo. In the seven remaining studies, pentoxifylline was compared with flunarizine (one study), aspirin (one study), Gingko biloba extract (one study), nylidrin hydrochloride (one study), prostaglandin E1 (two studies) and buflomedil and nifedipine (one study). The quality of the evidence was generally low, with large variability in reported findings.. Most included studies did not report on random sequence generation and allocation concealment, did not provide adequate information to allow selective reporting to be judged and did not report blinding of assessors. Heterogeneity between included studies was considerable with regards to multiple variables, including duration of treatment, dose of pentoxifylline, baseline walking distance and participant characteristics; therefore, pooled analysis was not possible.Of 17 studies comparing pentoxifylline with placebo, 14 reported TWD and 11 reported PFWD; the difference in percentage improvement in TWD for pentoxifylline over placebo ranged from 1.2% to 155.9%, and in PFWD from -33.8% to 73.9%. Testing the statistical significance of these results generally was not possible because data were insufficient. Most included studies suggested improvement in PFWD and TWD for pentoxifylline over placebo and other treatments, but the statistical and clinical significance of findings from individual trials is unclear. Pentoxifylline generally was well tolerated; the most commonly reported side effects consisted of gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the generally poor quality of published studies and the large degree of heterogeneity evident in interventions and in results, the overall benefit of pentoxifylline for patients with Fontaine class II intermittent claudication remains uncertain. Pentoxifylline was shown to be generally well tolerated.Based on total available evidence, high-quality data are currently insufficient to reveal the benefits of pentoxifylline for intermittent claudication.
间歇性跛行(IC)是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的一种症状,与高发病率和高死亡率相关。己酮可可碱是用于治疗间歇性跛行的众多药物之一,其作用机制是降低血液粘度、提高红细胞柔韧性并促进微循环血流及组织氧浓度。许多研究评估了己酮可可碱治疗外周动脉疾病患者的疗效,但这些研究结果存在差异。这是对2012年首次发表的一篇综述的更新。
确定己酮可可碱对改善Fontaine II期稳定型间歇性跛行患者步行能力(即无痛步行距离和总(绝对、最大)步行距离)的疗效。
对于本次更新,Cochrane血管组试验检索协调员检索了专业注册库(最后检索时间为2015年4月)和Cochrane研究注册库(2015年第3期)。
所有比较己酮可可碱与安慰剂或其他任何药物干预措施治疗Fontaine II期间歇性跛行患者的双盲随机对照试验(RCT)。
两名综述作者分别评估纳入研究,匹配数据并通过讨论解决分歧。综述作者使用Cochrane“偏倚风险”工具评估研究的方法学质量,并收集与无痛步行距离(PFWD)和总步行距离(TWD)相关的结果。研究比较基于己酮可可碱的治疗持续时间和剂量。
本综述纳入了24项研究,共3377名参与者。17项研究比较了己酮可可碱与安慰剂。其余7项研究中,己酮可可碱分别与氟桂利嗪(1项研究)、阿司匹林(1项研究)、银杏叶提取物(1项研究)、盐酸尼立替林(1项研究)、前列腺素E1(2项研究)以及丁咯地尔和硝苯地平(1项研究)进行了比较。证据质量总体较低,报告结果差异很大。大多数纳入研究未报告随机序列生成和分配隐藏情况,未提供足够信息以判断选择性报告情况,也未报告评估者的盲法情况。纳入研究在多个变量方面存在相当大的异质性,包括治疗持续时间、己酮可可碱剂量、基线步行距离和参与者特征;因此,无法进行汇总分析。在17项比较己酮可可碱与安慰剂的研究中,14项报告了总步行距离,11项报告了无痛步行距离;己酮可可碱相对于安慰剂在总步行距离改善百分比方面的差异为1.2%至155.9%,在无痛步行距离方面的差异为 - 33.8%至73.9%。由于数据不足,通常无法对这些结果进行统计学显著性检验。大多数纳入研究表明,己酮可可碱相对于安慰剂和其他治疗在无痛步行距离和总步行距离方面有所改善,但个别试验结果的统计学和临床意义尚不清楚。己酮可可碱总体耐受性良好;最常报告的副作用包括恶心等胃肠道症状。
鉴于已发表研究的质量普遍较差,且干预措施和结果中存在明显的高度异质性,己酮可可碱对Fontaine II期间歇性跛行患者的总体益处仍不确定。已表明己酮可可碱总体耐受性良好。基于现有全部证据,目前高质量数据不足以揭示己酮可可碱对间歇性跛行的益处。