Rahman Hena, Singh Shailja, Chandra Anil, Chandra Ramesh, Tripathi Supratim
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Career Post-Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Lucknow, India.
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Aust Endod J. 2016 Aug;42(2):60-5. doi: 10.1111/aej.12127. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
This study was carried out to compare the different techniques of placement of polyethylene fibre (Ribbond) on reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with MOD cavities in vitro. Forty extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10). Teeth in Groups I-IV received root canal treatment and a MOD cavity preparation, with gingival cavosurface margin 1.5 mm in coronal to cementoenamel junction. Group I served as no fibre group, Group II as occlusal fibre group, Group III as base fibre group and Group IV as dual-fibre group (occlusal and base both). Subsequent to restoring with composite resin and thermocycling, a vertical compressive force was applied at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm min(-1) using universal testing machine until fracture. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc tests. Fracture resistance was significantly highest in dual-fibre group (P < 0.001) as compared with other groups. The highest favourable fracture rate was observed in the base fibre group (70%). This study concluded that the use of polyethylene fibre inserted over or under the restoration significantly increased the fracture strength of the root canal-treated teeth and maximum fracture resistance was observed when cavity was restored using dual-fibre technique.
本研究旨在体外比较在有MOD洞型的根管治疗牙修复中放置聚乙烯纤维(Ribbond)的不同技术。40颗拔除的人前磨牙被随机分为四组(n = 10)。I - IV组的牙齿均接受根管治疗并制备MOD洞型,龈缘洞缘距牙骨质釉质界冠方1.5毫米。I组为无纤维组,II组为咬合面纤维组,III组为基底纤维组,IV组为双纤维组(咬合面和基底均有)。在用复合树脂修复并进行热循环后,使用万能试验机以0.5毫米/分钟(-1)的十字头速度施加垂直压缩力直至折断。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验进行分析。与其他组相比,双纤维组的抗折强度显著最高(P < 0.001)。基底纤维组观察到最高的良好折断率(70%)。本研究得出结论,在修复体上方或下方插入聚乙烯纤维可显著提高根管治疗牙的抗折强度,当使用双纤维技术修复洞型时观察到最大抗折性。