• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国生物类似药的药物警戒考量

Pharmacovigilance Considerations for Biosimilars in the USA.

作者信息

Grampp Gustavo, Felix Thomas

机构信息

Amgen Inc., Longmont, CO, USA.

Amgen Inc., 601 13th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.

出版信息

BioDrugs. 2015 Oct;29(5):309-21. doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0137-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40259-015-0137-2
PMID:26419971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4626527/
Abstract

In 2015, five or more biosimilars may be approved in the USA. Because no two biologic medicines are identical, postapproval safety monitoring will be critical to detect potential differences in safety signals between a biosimilar, its reference product, and other biosimilars. Postapproval safety monitoring in the USA uses two signal detection systems: spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) and active surveillance (AS) systems. Both depend on accurate identification of the specific product(s) dispensed or administered to patients, which may be compromised when products from multiple manufacturers share common drug nomenclature or coding. Product identification can present challenges across different healthcare settings, including inpatient and ambulatory care. Common oral-dosage drugs are predominantly dispensed directly to patients by pharmacists, whereas most injectable drugs, including biologics, are administered to patients by healthcare professionals in outpatient clinics or hospitals. Thus, the effectiveness of SRS and AS mechanisms in both pharmacy and medical channels must be given greater consideration as biotechnology matures. In this article, we describe these systems and their limitations. We identify challenges and opportunities for product-specific safety surveillance of biologics in both the pharmacy and medical settings and provide recommendations to improve biologic safety surveillance under the current and future systems envisioned in the Drug Quality and Security Act. As biosimilars are integrated into existing pharmacovigilance systems, distinguishable nonproprietary names and codes for all biologics, as well as other opportunities to improve traceability (e.g., increased use of barcodes), must be considered to ensure patient safety and confidence in this new class of drugs.

摘要

2015年,美国可能会批准五种或更多的生物类似药。由于没有两种生物药是完全相同的,批准后安全监测对于发现生物类似药、其参照产品以及其他生物类似药之间潜在的安全信号差异至关重要。美国的批准后安全监测使用两种信号检测系统:自发报告系统(SRSs)和主动监测(AS)系统。这两种系统都依赖于准确识别给患者配药或用药的特定产品,而当多个制造商的产品共用通用药品名称或编码时,这一点可能会受到影响。产品识别在不同的医疗环境中都会面临挑战,包括住院护理和门诊护理。普通口服剂型药物主要由药剂师直接配发给患者,而大多数注射用药物,包括生物药,则由门诊诊所或医院的医护人员给患者使用。因此,随着生物技术的成熟,必须更加重视SRS和AS机制在药房和医疗渠道的有效性。在本文中,我们描述了这些系统及其局限性。我们确定了在药房和医疗环境中对生物药进行特定产品安全监测的挑战和机遇,并就《药品质量与安全法案》设想的当前及未来系统下改善生物药安全监测提出了建议。随着生物类似药被纳入现有的药物警戒系统,必须考虑为所有生物药提供可区分的通用名称和编码,以及其他提高可追溯性的机会(例如增加条形码的使用),以确保患者对这类新型药物的安全和信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e5/4626527/3784eaeaf01e/40259_2015_137_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e5/4626527/18a7e73e01ff/40259_2015_137_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e5/4626527/3784eaeaf01e/40259_2015_137_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e5/4626527/18a7e73e01ff/40259_2015_137_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e5/4626527/3784eaeaf01e/40259_2015_137_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacovigilance Considerations for Biosimilars in the USA.美国生物类似药的药物警戒考量
BioDrugs. 2015 Oct;29(5):309-21. doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0137-2.
2
Pharmacovigilance and biosimilars: considerations, needs and challenges.药物警戒与生物类似药:考虑因素、需求和挑战。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013 Jul;13(7):1039-47. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.783560. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
Pharmacovigilance of Biologics in a Multisource Environment.生物制剂多源环境下的药物警戒。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Dec;23(12):1249-1254. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.12.1249.
4
Current state of biologic pharmacovigilance in the European Union: improvements are needed.欧盟生物药物警戒的现状:需要改进。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Mar;18(3):231-240. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1577818. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Similar names for similar biologics.相似生物制品的相似名称。
BioDrugs. 2014 Oct;28(5):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s40259-014-0099-9.
6
Nomenclature and traceability debate for biosimilars: small-molecule surrogates lend support for distinguishable nonproprietary names.生物类似药的命名与可追溯性辩论:小分子替代物为可区分的通用名提供支持。
Adv Ther. 2015 Mar;32(3):270-83. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0193-5. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
Assessment of pharmacists' views on biosimilar naming conventions.评估药师对生物类似药命名规范的看法。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Mar;21(3):188-95. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.3.188.
8
Postmarketing Safety of Biosimilars: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities in the Spontaneous Reporting System.生物类似药的上市后安全性:自发报告系统的现状、挑战和机遇。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):667-680. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00101-6. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
9
Biosimilars 101: considerations for U.S. oncologists in clinical practice.生物类似药基础指南:美国肿瘤学家临床实践中的考量因素
Cancer Med. 2014 Aug;3(4):889-99. doi: 10.1002/cam4.258. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction.生物制剂(包括生物类似药)的安全性:现状与未来方向的视角。
Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1013-1022. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.转移性结直肠癌中口服酪氨酸激酶抑制剂引起的神经精神药物不良反应:来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 31;13:1268672. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1268672. eCollection 2023.
2
Future Evolution of Biosimilar Development by Application of Current Science and Available Evidence: The Developer's Perspective.从当前科学和现有证据应用角度看生物类似药的未来发展:开发者的视角。
BioDrugs. 2023 Sep;37(5):583-593. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00619-0. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying and Quantifying the Accuracy of Product Name Attribution of US-Sourced Adverse Event Reports in MedWatch of Somatropins and Insulins.识别并量化美国来源的生长激素和胰岛素类药物不良事件报告在MedWatch中的产品名称归因准确性。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Sep;49(5):706-716. doi: 10.1177/2168479015578156.
2
Active and passive surveillance of enoxaparin generics: a case study relevant to biosimilars.依诺肝素仿制药的主动和被动监测:一个与生物类似药相关的案例研究。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015 Mar;14(3):349-60. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1001364. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
3
Similar names for similar biologics.
An Institutional Guide for Formulary Decisions of Biosimilars.
生物类似药处方集决策机构指南。
Hosp Pharm. 2023 Feb;58(1):38-48. doi: 10.1177/00185787221138007. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
4
Medication Risk Management.药物风险管理
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i1.1647. eCollection 2019.
5
The Challenges of Switching Therapies in an Evolving Multiple Biosimilars Landscape: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.在不断发展的多种生物类似药领域中切换治疗方案的挑战:当前证据的叙述性综述。
Adv Ther. 2020 Nov;37(11):4491-4518. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01472-1. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Pharmacovigilance of Biopharmaceuticals in Rheumatic Diseases, Adverse Events, Evolution, and Perspective: An Overview.风湿性疾病生物制药的药物警戒、不良事件、发展及展望:概述
Biomedicines. 2020 Aug 23;8(9):303. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8090303.
7
Safety of BRAF+MEK Inhibitor Combinations: Severe Adverse Event Evaluation.BRAF+MEK抑制剂联合用药的安全性:严重不良事件评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 22;12(6):1650. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061650.
8
Biosimilars: Considerations for Payers.生物类似药:支付方的考量因素
P T. 2019 Jan;44(2):54-63.
9
The biosimilars journey: current status and ongoing challenges.生物类似药的发展历程:现状与持续面临的挑战
Drugs Context. 2018 Oct 1;7:212543. doi: 10.7573/dic.212543. eCollection 2018.
10
Practical Guidance on Biosimilars, With a Focus on Latin America: What Do Rheumatologists Need to Know?关于生物类似药的实用指南,重点关注拉丁美洲:风湿病学家需要了解什么?
J Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Mar;25(2):91-100. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000881.
相似生物制品的相似名称。
BioDrugs. 2014 Oct;28(5):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s40259-014-0099-9.
4
Biologic product identification and US pharmacovigilance in the biosimilars era.
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Feb;32(2):128-30. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2823.
5
Traceability of biopharmaceuticals in spontaneous reporting systems: a cross-sectional study in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and EudraVigilance databases.生物制药在自发报告系统中的可追溯性:FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和 EudraVigilance 数据库中的一项横断面研究。
Drug Saf. 2013 Aug;36(8):617-25. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0073-3.
6
Pharmacovigilance and biosimilars: considerations, needs and challenges.药物警戒与生物类似药:考虑因素、需求和挑战。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013 Jul;13(7):1039-47. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.783560. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
7
Evaluating the completeness and accuracy of MedWatch data.评估药品不良事件监测数据的完整性和准确性。
Am J Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):442-6. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318262316f.
8
Detection of pharmacovigilance-related adverse events using electronic health records and automated methods.利用电子健康记录和自动化方法检测药物警戒相关不良事件。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;92(2):228-34. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.54. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010.基于疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS),1990-2010 年按疫苗剂量和年龄划分的婴儿住院和死亡的相对趋势。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012 Oct;31(10):1012-21. doi: 10.1177/0960327112440111. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
10
A systematic review of validated methods for identifying anaphylaxis, including anaphylactic shock and angioneurotic edema, using administrative and claims data.使用行政和索赔数据对过敏反应(包括过敏性休克和血管神经性水肿)进行验证方法的系统评价。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:240-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.2327.