Grampp Gustavo, Felix Thomas
Amgen Inc., Longmont, CO, USA.
Amgen Inc., 601 13th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA.
BioDrugs. 2015 Oct;29(5):309-21. doi: 10.1007/s40259-015-0137-2.
In 2015, five or more biosimilars may be approved in the USA. Because no two biologic medicines are identical, postapproval safety monitoring will be critical to detect potential differences in safety signals between a biosimilar, its reference product, and other biosimilars. Postapproval safety monitoring in the USA uses two signal detection systems: spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) and active surveillance (AS) systems. Both depend on accurate identification of the specific product(s) dispensed or administered to patients, which may be compromised when products from multiple manufacturers share common drug nomenclature or coding. Product identification can present challenges across different healthcare settings, including inpatient and ambulatory care. Common oral-dosage drugs are predominantly dispensed directly to patients by pharmacists, whereas most injectable drugs, including biologics, are administered to patients by healthcare professionals in outpatient clinics or hospitals. Thus, the effectiveness of SRS and AS mechanisms in both pharmacy and medical channels must be given greater consideration as biotechnology matures. In this article, we describe these systems and their limitations. We identify challenges and opportunities for product-specific safety surveillance of biologics in both the pharmacy and medical settings and provide recommendations to improve biologic safety surveillance under the current and future systems envisioned in the Drug Quality and Security Act. As biosimilars are integrated into existing pharmacovigilance systems, distinguishable nonproprietary names and codes for all biologics, as well as other opportunities to improve traceability (e.g., increased use of barcodes), must be considered to ensure patient safety and confidence in this new class of drugs.
2015年,美国可能会批准五种或更多的生物类似药。由于没有两种生物药是完全相同的,批准后安全监测对于发现生物类似药、其参照产品以及其他生物类似药之间潜在的安全信号差异至关重要。美国的批准后安全监测使用两种信号检测系统:自发报告系统(SRSs)和主动监测(AS)系统。这两种系统都依赖于准确识别给患者配药或用药的特定产品,而当多个制造商的产品共用通用药品名称或编码时,这一点可能会受到影响。产品识别在不同的医疗环境中都会面临挑战,包括住院护理和门诊护理。普通口服剂型药物主要由药剂师直接配发给患者,而大多数注射用药物,包括生物药,则由门诊诊所或医院的医护人员给患者使用。因此,随着生物技术的成熟,必须更加重视SRS和AS机制在药房和医疗渠道的有效性。在本文中,我们描述了这些系统及其局限性。我们确定了在药房和医疗环境中对生物药进行特定产品安全监测的挑战和机遇,并就《药品质量与安全法案》设想的当前及未来系统下改善生物药安全监测提出了建议。随着生物类似药被纳入现有的药物警戒系统,必须考虑为所有生物药提供可区分的通用名称和编码,以及其他提高可追溯性的机会(例如增加条形码的使用),以确保患者对这类新型药物的安全和信心。