Fajardo Alex, Torres-Díaz Cristian, Till-Bottraud Irène
Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP) Conicyt-Regional R10C1003, Universidad Austral de Chile, Camino Baguales s/n, Coyhaique 5951601, Chile,
Laboratorio de Genómica y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Casilla 447, Chillán, Chile.
Ann Bot. 2016 Jan;117(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv148. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
Disturbances, dispersal and biotic interactions are three major drivers of the spatial distribution of genotypes within populations, the last of which has been less studied than the other two. This study aimed to determine the role of competition and facilitation in the degree of conspecific genetic relatedness of nearby individuals of tree populations. It was expected that competition among conspecifics will lead to low relatedness, while facilitation will lead to high relatedness (selection for high relatedness within clusters).
The stand structure and spatial genetic structure (SGS) of trees were examined within old-growth and second-growth forests (including multi-stemmed trees at the edge of forests) of Nothofagus pumilio following large-scale fires in Patagonia, Chile. Genetic spatial autocorrelations were computed on a spatially explicit sampling of the forests using five microsatellite loci. As biotic plant interactions occur among immediate neighbours, mean nearest neighbour distance (MNND) among trees was computed as a threshold for distinguishing the effects of disturbances and biotic interactions.
All forests exhibited a significant SGS for distances greater than the MNND. The old-growth forest genetic and stand structure indicated gap recolonization from nearby trees (significantly related trees at distances between 4 and 10 m). At distances smaller than the MNND, trees of the second-growth interior forest showed significantly lower relatedness, suggesting a fading of the recolonization structure by competition, whereas the second-growth edge forest showed a positive and highly significant relatedness among trees (higher among stems of a cluster than among stems of different clusters), resulting from facilitation.
Biotic interactions are shown to influence the genetic composition of a tree population. However, facilitation can only persist if individuals are related. Thus, the genetic composition in turn influences what type of biotic interactions will take place among immediate neighbours in post-disturbance forests.
干扰、扩散和生物相互作用是种群内基因型空间分布的三个主要驱动因素,其中最后一个因素的研究少于前两个。本研究旨在确定竞争和促进作用在树木种群相邻个体的同种遗传相关性程度中的作用。预计同种个体间的竞争将导致低相关性,而促进作用将导致高相关性(在集群内选择高相关性)。
在智利巴塔哥尼亚发生大规模火灾后,对矮沙冬青的原始森林和次生林(包括森林边缘的多干树木)中的树木林分结构和空间遗传结构(SGS)进行了研究。使用五个微卫星位点,对森林的空间明确采样计算遗传空间自相关。由于生物植物相互作用发生在直接相邻个体之间,计算树木之间的平均最近邻距离(MNND)作为区分干扰和生物相互作用影响的阈值。
对于大于MNND的距离,所有森林都表现出显著的SGS。原始森林的遗传和林分结构表明附近树木的林窗再定殖(在4至10米距离处有显著相关的树木)。在小于MNND的距离处,次生林内部的树木显示出显著较低的相关性,表明竞争使再定殖结构逐渐消失,而次生林边缘森林的树木之间显示出正的且高度显著的相关性(同一集群的茎之间比不同集群的茎之间更高),这是促进作用的结果。
生物相互作用被证明会影响树木种群的遗传组成。然而,促进作用只有在个体相关时才能持续。因此,遗传组成反过来又会影响干扰后森林中直接相邻个体之间将发生何种类型的生物相互作用。