Chagnon Pierre-Luc, U'Ren Jana M, Miadlikowska Jolanta, Lutzoni François, Arnold A Elizabeth
Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boul. de L'Université, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada.
School of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Oecologia. 2016 Jan;180(1):181-91. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3457-5. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
Understanding the factors that shape community assembly remains one of the most enduring and important questions in modern ecology. Network theory can reveal rules of community assembly within and across study systems and suggest novel hypotheses regarding the formation and stability of communities. However, such studies generally face the challenge of disentangling the relative influence of factors such as interaction type and environmental conditions on shaping communities and associated networks. Endophytic and endolichenic symbioses, characterized by microbial species that occur within healthy plants and lichen thalli, represent some of the most ubiquitous interactions in nature. Fungi that engage in these symbioses are hyperdiverse, often horizontally transmitted, and functionally beneficial in many cases, and they represent the diversification of multiple phylogenetic groups. We evaluated six measures of ecological network structure for >4100 isolates of endophytic and endolichenic fungi collected systematically from five sites across North America. Our comparison of these co-occurring interactions in biomes ranging from tundra to subtropical forest showed that the type of interactions (i.e., endophytic vs. endolichenic) had a much more pronounced influence on network structure than did environmental conditions. In particular, endophytic networks were less nested, less connected, and more modular than endolichenic networks in all sites. The consistency of the network structure within each interaction type, independent of site, is encouraging for current efforts devoted to gathering metadata on ecological network structure at a global scale. We discuss several mechanisms potentially responsible for such patterns and draw attention to knowledge gaps in our understanding of networks for diverse interaction types.
理解塑造群落组装的因素仍然是现代生态学中最持久且重要的问题之一。网络理论可以揭示研究系统内部和跨系统的群落组装规则,并提出关于群落形成和稳定性的新假设。然而,此类研究通常面临着区分相互作用类型和环境条件等因素对塑造群落及相关网络的相对影响这一挑战。内生和地衣内共生现象,其特征是微生物物种存在于健康植物和地衣叶状体中,是自然界中一些最普遍的相互作用。参与这些共生关系的真菌种类繁多,通常通过水平传播,且在许多情况下具有功能益处,它们代表了多个系统发育类群的多样化。我们对从北美五个地点系统收集的4100多种内生和地衣内真菌分离株的生态网络结构的六个指标进行了评估。我们对从苔原到亚热带森林等生物群落中这些同时出现的相互作用的比较表明,相互作用类型(即内生与地衣内)对网络结构的影响比环境条件更为显著。特别是,在所有地点,内生网络比地衣内网络的嵌套性更低、连通性更差且模块性更强。每种相互作用类型内网络结构的一致性,与地点无关,这对于当前致力于在全球范围内收集生态网络结构元数据的努力来说是令人鼓舞的。我们讨论了可能导致此类模式的几种机制,并提请注意我们在理解不同相互作用类型的网络方面的知识空白。