Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛治疗与扰频疗法:一项多中心回顾性分析

Chronic pain treatment and scrambler therapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Compagnone Christian, Tagliaferri Fernanda

机构信息

II Unit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy. University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2015 Sep 14;86(2):149-56.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Scrambler Therapy is a novel neuromodulation that works by electrocutaneous stimulation in a non-invasive manner through C fibers surface receptors. It substitutes pain information with synthetic "non pain" information. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of Scrambler Therapy after ten sessions related to different usage conditions and different learning curves that occur in a multi-center study.

METHODS

201 patients have been treated with Scrambler Therapy. All the patients were suffering from chronic pain with a mean pain NRS of 7.41 (SD 2.06) before treatment. Main causes of chronic pain: post herpetic neuralgia 18.40 %, chronic low back pain (LBP) 37.31%, polyneuropathy 10.94%, and peripheral neuropathy 14.42 %. The remaining 18.93 % included chronic pain due to other causes.

RESULTS

The difference between pre-treatment NRS 7.41 (SD 2.06) and post-treatment 1.60 (SD 2.22) was statistically significant (P< 0.0001). The mean number of sessions per patient was 10, but 39 had complete absence of pain sooner and used fewer sessions. Only 7 patients stopped treatment due to lack of results, and 2 for personal reasons not ascribable to the treatment. Stimulation pain score of 0 during treatment, and not just pain reduction, predicts long term effectiveness, so this must be pursued by optimizing electrode positioning and correct fine-tuning of stimulation intensity.

CONCLUSION

Scrambler Therapy is an efficient and safe alternative for several different types of refractory chronic neuropathic pain, with a very rare possibility of adverse events.

摘要

背景与目的

扰频器疗法是一种新型神经调节疗法,通过对C纤维表面受体进行非侵入性的经皮电刺激发挥作用。它用合成的“非疼痛”信息替代疼痛信息。本研究的主要目的是分析在多中心研究中,与不同使用条件和不同学习曲线相关的十次治疗后扰频器疗法的疗效和安全性。

方法

201例患者接受了扰频器疗法治疗。所有患者均患有慢性疼痛,治疗前疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)平均为7.41(标准差2.06)。慢性疼痛的主要原因:带状疱疹后神经痛18.40%,慢性下腰痛(LBP)37.31%,多发性神经病10.94%,以及周围神经病14.42%。其余18.93%包括其他原因引起的慢性疼痛。

结果

治疗前NRS为7.41(标准差2.06)与治疗后1.60(标准差2.22)之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。每位患者的平均治疗次数为10次,但有39例患者疼痛完全消失得更早且治疗次数更少。只有7例患者因缺乏疗效而停止治疗,2例因与治疗无关的个人原因停止治疗。治疗期间刺激疼痛评分为0,而不仅仅是疼痛减轻,可预测长期疗效,因此必须通过优化电极定位和正确微调刺激强度来实现。

结论

扰频器疗法是治疗几种不同类型难治性慢性神经性疼痛的一种有效且安全的替代方法,不良事件发生的可能性非常小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验