Gilles Montalescot, MD, PhD, Institut de Cardiologie, Bureau 2-236, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France, Tel.:+33 1 4216 3006, Fax:+33 1 4216 2931, E-mail:
Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jan;115(2):382-91. doi: 10.1160/TH15-05-0394. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Our aim was to demonstrate that the sequential use of the Verigene® rapid CYP2C19 test for genetic profiling and the VerifyNowTM bedside test for platelet function measurement in ACS patients may optimise P2Y12 inhibition. "Rapid" (CYP2C191/1 or CYP2C1917 carriers, n=211) and "slow" metabolisers (CYP2C192 carriers, n=58) were first put on clopidogrel and prasugrel for ≥ 2 weeks, respectively. Patients with low platelet reactivity (PRU<30) on prasugrel or high platelet reactivity (>208 PRU) on clopidogrel were then switched to clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively. Our objectives were (i) to demonstrate that the proportion of "rapid" metabolisers on 75 mg of clopidogrel within 30-208 (PRU) of P2Y12 inhibition is non-inferior to "slow" metabolisers on prasugrel 10 mg and (ii) to evaluate the same end-point after switching drugs. The proportion of "rapid" and "slow" metabolisers within 30-208 PRU of P2Y12 inhibition was 71% and 56.9%, respectively, an absolute difference of +14.1% (95% CI, -0.05% to 28.28%) with a non-inferiority margin greater than the predefined margin of -10%. Among patients out of target, all but one "slow" metabolisers displayed low-on prasugrel platelet reactivity while the majority of "rapid" metabolisers (68%) displayed high-on clopidogrel platelet reactivity. After switching, the proportion of patients within 30-208 PRU of P2Y12 inhibition was 83.6% and 79.3% in "rapid" and "slow" metabolisers, respectively (+4.3%, 95% CI -7.3% to 15.9%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates a loose relationship between genotype and platelet function phenotype approaches but that they are complementary to select prasugrel or clopidogrel MD in stented ACS patients.
我们的目的是证明,在 ACS 患者中,连续使用 Verigene®快速 CYP2C19 检测进行基因分析和 VerifyNowTM 床边检测进行血小板功能测量,可以优化 P2Y12 抑制。首先,将“快速”(CYP2C191/1 或 CYP2C1917 携带者,n=211)和“缓慢”代谢者(CYP2C192 携带者,n=58)分别服用氯吡格雷和普拉格雷≥2 周。然后,在普拉格雷时血小板反应性低(PRU<30)或在氯吡格雷时血小板反应性高(>208 PRU)的患者分别换用氯吡格雷和普拉格雷。我们的目标是:(i)证明在 75mg 氯吡格雷时,75mg 氯吡格雷的“快速”代谢者在 30-208(PRU)范围内的比例与普拉格雷 10mg 的“缓慢”代谢者不劣于;(ii)评价药物转换后的相同终点。在 30-208 PRU 的 P2Y12 抑制范围内,“快速”和“缓慢”代谢者的比例分别为 71%和 56.9%,绝对差值为+14.1%(95%CI,-0.05%至 28.28%),非劣效性边界大于预设的-10%边界。在目标之外的患者中,除了一个“缓慢”代谢者外,所有患者在普拉格雷时血小板反应性均较低,而大多数“快速”代谢者(68%)在氯吡格雷时血小板反应性较高。转换后,“快速”和“缓慢”代谢者在 30-208 PRU 的范围内的患者比例分别为 83.6%和 79.3%(+4.3%,95%CI-7.3%至 15.9%)。总之,这项研究表明基因型和血小板功能表型方法之间存在松散的关系,但它们可以互补,以选择支架 ACS 患者使用普拉格雷或氯吡格雷 MD。