Valley Thomas S, Cooke Colin R
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
Crit Care. 2015 Oct 1;19:347. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1074-7.
Race has been identified as an important risk factor for the development of sepsis and as a predictor of poor outcomes in sepsis. For example, black individuals have been demonstrated to be nearly twice as likely to develop sepsis and to have greater mortality from sepsis than white individuals. Recent data from a longitudinal cohort, which examined incident hospitalizations for infections occurring among participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort, contradicts this prior research. Investigators determined that black participants were significantly less likely than white participants to present to the hospital with either infection or sepsis. Although these results are intriguing, they highlight our inadequate understanding of the relationship between race and sepsis and motivate the need for higher quality epidemiologic research to isolate the true role of race in the development of sepsis.
种族已被确定为脓毒症发生的一个重要风险因素,也是脓毒症不良预后的一个预测指标。例如,事实证明,黑人患脓毒症的可能性几乎是白人的两倍,且因脓毒症导致的死亡率更高。一项纵向队列研究的最新数据与之前的研究相矛盾,该研究调查了中风地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)队列参与者中发生的感染导致的住院情况。研究人员确定,黑人参与者因感染或脓毒症入院的可能性明显低于白人参与者。尽管这些结果很有趣,但它们凸显了我们对种族与脓毒症之间关系的理解不足,并激发了开展更高质量流行病学研究的必要性,以确定种族在脓毒症发生过程中的真正作用。