Savage Jason W, Kelly Mick P, Ellison Scott A, Anderson Paul A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois;
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; and.
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E13. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15240.
OBJECT The authors compared the rates of postoperative adverse events and reoperation of patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) to those of patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion without BMP. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed the PearlDiver Technologies, Inc., database, which contains the Medicare Standard Analytical Files, the Medicare Carrier Files, the PearlDiver Private Payer Database (UnitedHealthcare), and select state all-payer data sets, from 2005 to 2010. They identified patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with and without BMP. The ICD-9-CM code 84.52 was used to identify patients who underwent spinal fusion with BMP. ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes identified complications that occurred during the initial hospital stay. ICD-9-CM procedural codes were used to identify reoperations within 90 days of the index procedure. The relative risks (and 95% CIs) of BMP use compared with no BMP use (control) were calculated for the association of any complication with BMP use compared with the control. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2010, 460,773 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion were identified. BMP was used in 30.7% of these patients. The overall complication rate in the BMP group was 18.2% compared with 18.7% in the control group. The relative risk of BMP use compared with no BMP use was 0.976 (95% CI 0.963-0.989), which indicates a significantly lower overall complication rate in the BMP group (p < 0.001). In both treatment groups, patients older than 65 years had a statistically significant higher rate of postoperative complications than younger patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large-scale institutionalized database study, BMP use did not seem to increase the overall risk of developing a postoperative complication after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
目的 作者比较了接受含骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)的腰椎融合术患者与接受不含BMP的腰椎融合术患者的术后不良事件发生率和再次手术率。方法 作者回顾性分析了PearlDiver Technologies公司的数据库,该数据库包含2005年至2010年的医疗保险标准分析文件、医疗保险承保人文件、PearlDiver私人支付者数据库(联合健康保险)以及部分州的全支付者数据集。他们识别出接受含和不含BMP的腰椎融合术的患者。使用ICD-9-CM编码84.52来识别接受含BMP的脊柱融合术的患者。ICD-9-CM诊断编码用于识别初次住院期间发生的并发症。ICD-9-CM手术编码用于识别索引手术90天内的再次手术。计算使用BMP与不使用BMP(对照)相比的相对风险(及95%可信区间),以比较使用BMP与对照相比任何并发症的关联。结果 在2005年至2010年期间,识别出460,773例接受腰椎融合术的患者。这些患者中有30.7%使用了BMP。BMP组的总体并发症发生率为18.2%,而对照组为18.7%。使用BMP与不使用BMP相比的相对风险为0.976(95%可信区间0.963 - 0.989),这表明BMP组的总体并发症发生率显著更低(p < 0.001)。在两个治疗组中,65岁以上患者的术后并发症发生率在统计学上显著高于年轻患者(p < 0.001)。结论 在这项大规模的机构数据库研究中,使用BMP似乎并未增加腰椎融合术后发生术后并发症的总体风险。