Fine J D, Tyring S, Gammon W R
Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.
J Invest Dermatol. 1989 Jan;92(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep13070463.
In evaluating patients we have noted disparity between the locations of bound immunoreactants and the level of blistering in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). We examined 10 consecutive EBA patients by routine histology, direct (DIF) and indirect (IIF; intact and NaCl-split skin) immunofluorescence, immunofluorescence mapping (IM), and/or direct immunoelectron microscopy (DIEM). DIF was positive in each. IIF was positive in 3/8 and 6/7 patients when intact and split skin were used as substrates. DIEM revealed immunoreactants within the lamina densa (LD) in 6/10, sub-LD in 1/10, and both LD and sub-LD in 3/10 patients. In contrast, by DIEM and IM, blister formation was noted within the lamina lucida (LL) in 7/9 and 8/10, sub-LD in 1/9 and 1/10, and within both LL and sub-LD in 1/9 and 1/10, respectively. In the presence of neutrophils within the upper dermis (n = 6), cleavage occurred within the LL in 5 specimens; in one additional specimen containing predominantly neutrophils, cleavage occurred within both LL and sub-LD. In the presence of mononuclear cells (n = 2), intra-LL cleavage occurred. In the presence of eosinophils, cleavage occurred within both LL and sub-LD. In the one specimen lacking any infiltrate, the cleavage plane was exclusively sub-LD. Intra-LL cleavage planes are more common than sub-LD ones in at least early cases of EBA. These findings likely represent the intra-LL-separating effect of leukocyte-derived proteolytic enzymes, when such cells are chemoattracted to the dermoepidermal junction by bound immuno-reactants.
在评估患者时,我们注意到获得性大疱性表皮松解症(EBA)中结合免疫反应物的位置与水疱形成水平之间存在差异。我们通过常规组织学、直接免疫荧光(DIF)和间接免疫荧光(IIF;完整皮肤和经氯化钠处理分离的皮肤)、免疫荧光定位(IM)和/或直接免疫电子显微镜(DIEM)对10例连续的EBA患者进行了检查。每位患者的DIF均呈阳性。当使用完整皮肤和分离皮肤作为底物时,IIF在3/8和6/7的患者中呈阳性。DIEM显示,6/10的患者在致密板(LD)内有免疫反应物,1/10的患者在致密板下有免疫反应物,3/10的患者在致密板和致密板下均有免疫反应物。相比之下,通过DIEM和IM观察到,7/9和8/10的患者在透明板(LL)内形成水疱,1/9和1/10的患者在致密板下形成水疱,1/9和1/10的患者在透明板和致密板下均形成水疱。在上层真皮中有中性粒细胞存在的情况下(n = 6),5个标本在透明板内发生分离;在另一个主要含有中性粒细胞的标本中,在透明板和致密板下均发生分离。在有单核细胞存在的情况下(n = 2),在透明板内发生分离。在有嗜酸性粒细胞存在的情况下,在透明板和致密板下均发生分离。在一个没有任何浸润的标本中,分离平面仅在致密板下。至少在EBA的早期病例中,透明板内分离平面比致密板下分离平面更常见。这些发现可能代表了白细胞衍生的蛋白水解酶在透明板内的分离作用,当这些细胞被结合的免疫反应物趋化至真皮表皮交界处时。