Suppr超能文献

上消化道黏膜下病变的层次、大小和部位对内镜超声引导下细针抽吸结果的影响。

Influence of layer, size and organ of subepithelial lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract in outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

机构信息

Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(Suppl 1):S16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive and safe method for material procurement in the differential diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SEL) of upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT), especially in suspicious lesions of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). There are few studies discussing the factors that influence the EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of SEL.

AIM

To establish possible associations between lesion size, layer and organ of origin with the outcome of EUS-FNA in patients with SELs of UGT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis using data of patients referred to French-Brazilian Center of EUS of endoscopy Department of Santa Casa de São Paulo Hospital, with previous endoscopic diagnosis of SEL, which underwent EUS-FNA from May 2006 to August 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients were submitted to EUS. 15 with extrinsic compressions and 207 with SEL. Of these, 89 underwent to EUS-FNA. Ninety-two SEL were diagnosed on EUS and punctured. The EUS-FNA was positive in 58.7%. In lesions measuring 2-3 cm and >3 cm, the EUS-FNA was positive in 80% and 72%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The size of SELs was the only variable that influenced the outcome of EUS-FNA. Best results are achieved in lesions larger than 2 cm.

摘要

简介

内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)已成为一种微创且安全的方法,可用于上消化道(UGT)黏膜下病变(SEL)的鉴别诊断,尤其是胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的可疑病变。目前,关于影响 EUS-FNA 在 SEL 诊断中的因素的研究较少。

目的

探讨 SEL 患者的病变大小、起源层和起源器官与 EUS-FNA 结果之间的可能关联。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 5 月至 2011 年 8 月期间,因 UGT SEL 而接受内镜超声检查的法国-巴西内镜超声中心患者的数据,这些患者先前被内镜诊断为 SEL,并接受了 EUS-FNA 检查。

结果

共有 222 例患者接受了 EUS 检查。其中 15 例为外压性病变,207 例为 SEL。这些患者中,89 例行 EUS-FNA。92 例 SEL 在 EUS 下被诊断并进行了穿刺。EUS-FNA 的阳性率为 58.7%。在 2-3cm 和 >3cm 的病变中,EUS-FNA 的阳性率分别为 80%和 72%(P<0.001)。

结论

SEL 的大小是唯一影响 EUS-FNA 结果的变量。大于 2cm 的病变结果最佳。

相似文献

2
Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 2 cm.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Dec;23(4):405-12. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.234.eug.
3
Opinion: How to manage subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec 10;7(18):1262-7. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1262.
6
Clinical course of small gastric subepithelial lesion less than 20 mm diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jul;39(7):1285-1290. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16534. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 27;11(6):965. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060965.
9
Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for schwannoma: six cases of a retrospective study.
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2017 Aug 9;63(2):75-80. doi: 10.5387/fms.2015-21. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验