Suppr超能文献

评估程序能力:效度考量

Assessing Procedural Competence: Validity Considerations.

作者信息

Pugh Debra M, Wood Timothy J, Boulet John R

机构信息

From the Departments of Medicine (D.M.P.) and Innovation in Medical Education (T.J.W.), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; and Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (J.R.B.), Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Simul Healthc. 2015 Oct;10(5):288-94. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000101.

Abstract

Simulation-based medical education (SBME) offers opportunities for trainees to learn how to perform procedures and to be assessed in a safe environment. However, SBME research studies often lack robust evidence to support the validity of the interpretation of the results obtained from tools used to assess trainees' skills. The purpose of this paper is to describe how a validity framework can be applied when reporting and interpreting the results of a simulation-based assessment of skills related to performing procedures. The authors discuss various sources of validity evidence because they relate to SBME. A case study is presented.

摘要

基于模拟的医学教育(SBME)为学员提供了学习如何进行操作并在安全环境中接受评估的机会。然而,SBME研究往往缺乏有力证据来支持对用于评估学员技能的工具所获结果进行解释的有效性。本文旨在描述在报告和解释基于模拟的操作技能评估结果时如何应用有效性框架。作者讨论了与SBME相关的各种有效性证据来源。并呈现了一个案例研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验