Eterović Marija, Kozarić-Kovačić Dragica
University Hospital Dubrava, Department of Psychiatry, Referral Centre for Stress Related Disorders of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia, Avenija Gojka Suska 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Dubrava, Department of Psychiatry, Referral Centre for Stress Related Disorders of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Croatia, Avenija Gojka Suska 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Med Hypotheses. 2015 Dec;85(6):870-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Delusions are often recognized as key to the concept of psychosis. What is delusion is one of the basic questions of psychopathology. The common denominator of definitions of delusions is the divergence between the strong conviction in the delusional belief and superior evidences to the contrary which are continually ignored. An implicit, sustainably unspoken assumption is that the person with delusional belief has cognitive capacities to process the (counter-)arguments relevant to their delusion. However, individual's cognitive capacities are not being emphasized when delusions are evaluated. Moreover, the impact of cognitive decline on formation of delusions is neglected, both in theory and practice. We elaborate that cognitive deficits may facilitate, oppose, or mimic delusions. We focus on the last, which can lead to diagnosing as delusion what could be explained by cognitive decline and better called pseudo-delusion. The risk is significant when cognition is impaired, as in demented people; an issue which has not yet been debated. True delusions are incompatible with person's cognitive capacities, i.e., if we take into account person's cognitive status, we still cannot understand how the person holds the strange belief with an extraordinary conviction. Pseudo-delusions would be beliefs, thoughts or judgments that at first seem delusional (they are false, subculturally atypical beliefs that are strongly maintained in the face of counterargument), but lose the essence of delusions after we take cognitive impairment into account. Pseudo-delusions could actually be explained or understood by person's cognitive impairments, they "fit into" them. The reported reality-based contents of delusions in the elderly, poor response to antipsychotics and lack of association with early or family history of psychiatric disorders could in part be accounted for by the bias of misdiagnosing the cognitive impairment as the delusion. Not recognizing that the cognitive impairment underlies formation of pseudo-delusions and misdiagnosing it as delusions may lead to focusing on antipsychotic treatment, instead on treatment of the underlying cognitive deficit.
妄想通常被认为是精神病概念的关键。什么是妄想是精神病理学的基本问题之一。妄想定义的共同特征是对妄想信念的强烈坚信与不断被忽视的相反的有力证据之间的差异。一个隐含的、一直未被提及的假设是,有妄想信念的人具有处理与其妄想相关的(反)论点的认知能力。然而,在评估妄想时,个体的认知能力并未得到强调。此外,认知衰退对妄想形成的影响在理论和实践中都被忽视了。我们阐述了认知缺陷可能促进、对抗或模仿妄想。我们关注最后一种情况,即认知衰退可能导致将本可由认知衰退解释的情况诊断为妄想,更确切地说应称为假性妄想。当认知受损时,如在患有痴呆症的人群中,这种风险很大;这是一个尚未被讨论过的问题。真正的妄想与个体的认知能力不相符,也就是说,如果考虑到个体的认知状态,我们仍然无法理解这个人为何会以一种异常坚定的信念持有这种奇怪的信念。假性妄想起初似乎是妄想(它们是错误的、不符合亚文化规范的信念,面对反论点仍强烈坚持),但在我们考虑到认知障碍后就失去了妄想的本质。假性妄想实际上可以由个体的认知障碍来解释或理解,它们“符合”这些认知障碍。老年人妄想中所报告的基于现实的内容、对抗精神病药物反应不佳以及与精神疾病的早期或家族史缺乏关联,部分原因可能是将认知障碍误诊为妄想的偏差。没有认识到认知障碍是假性妄想形成的基础并将其误诊为妄想,可能会导致专注于抗精神病药物治疗,而不是治疗潜在的认知缺陷。