Jordan R W, Saithna A
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire and Southport and Ormskirk Hospitals NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX and Merseyside, UK.
Southport and Ormskirk Hospitals NHS Trust, Merseyside, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10):1370-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35297.
This article is a systematic review of the published literature about the biomechanics, functional outcome and complications of intramedullary nailing of fractures of the distal radius. We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases and included all studies which reported the outcome of intramedullary (IM) nailing of fractures of the distal radius. Data about functional outcome, range of movement (ROM), strength and complications, were extracted. The studies included were appraised independently by both authors using a validated quality assessment scale for non-controlled studies and the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategy revealed 785 studies, of which 16 were included for full paper review. These included three biomechanical studies, eight case series and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The biomechanical studies concluded that IM nails were at least as strong as locking plates. The clinical studies reported that IM nailing gave a comparable ROM, functional outcome and grip strength to other fixation techniques. However, the mean complication rate of intramedullary nailing was 17.6% (0% to 50%). This is higher than the rates reported in contemporary studies for volar plating. It raises concerns about the role of intramedullary nailing, particularly when comparative studies have failed to show that it has any major advantage over other techniques. Further adequately powered RCTs comparing the technique to both volar plating and percutaneous wire fixation are needed.
本文是一篇关于桡骨远端骨折髓内钉固定的生物力学、功能结果及并发症的已发表文献的系统综述。我们检索了Medline和EMBASE数据库,并纳入了所有报道桡骨远端骨折髓内钉固定结果的研究。提取了有关功能结果、活动范围(ROM)、力量及并发症的数据。两位作者分别使用经过验证的非对照研究质量评估量表和随机对照试验(RCT)的CONSORT声明,对纳入的研究进行独立评估。检索策略共找到785项研究,其中16项被纳入全文审查。这些研究包括三项生物力学研究、八个病例系列和五项随机对照试验(RCT)。生物力学研究得出结论,髓内钉至少与锁定钢板一样坚固。临床研究报告称,髓内钉固定在活动范围、功能结果和握力方面与其他固定技术相当。然而,髓内钉固定的平均并发症发生率为17.6%(0%至50%)。这高于当代掌侧钢板固定研究报告的发生率。这引发了人们对髓内钉固定作用的担忧,特别是当比较研究未能表明它比其他技术有任何主要优势时。需要进一步开展有足够样本量的随机对照试验,将该技术与掌侧钢板固定和经皮钢丝固定进行比较。