Duchman Kyle R, Westermann Robert W, Spindler Kurt P, Reinke Emily K, Huston Laura J, Amendola Annunziato, Wolf Brian R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2688-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546515604622. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
The management of meniscus tears identified at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is highly variable and includes repair, meniscectomy, and nontreatment.
HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the reoperation rate for meniscus tears left untreated at the time of ACL reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The hypothesis was that small peripheral tears identified at the time of ACL reconstruction managed with "no treatment" would have successful clinical outcomes.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Patients with meniscus tears left untreated at the time of primary ACL reconstruction were identified from a multicenter study group with a minimum 6-year follow-up. Patient, tear, and reoperation data were obtained for analysis. The need for reoperation was used as the primary endpoint, with analysis performed to determine patient and tear characteristics associated with reoperation.
There were 194 patients with 208 meniscus tears (71 medial, 137 lateral) left in situ without treatment with a complete follow-up for analysis. Of these, 97.8% of lateral and 94.4% of medial untreated tears required no reoperation. Sixteen tears (7.7%) left in situ without treatment underwent subsequent reoperation: 9 tears (4.3%) underwent reoperation in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction, and 7 tears (3.4%) underwent reoperation for an isolated meniscus injury. The patient age was significantly lower in patients requiring reoperation, while tears measuring ≥10 mm more frequently required reoperation.
Lateral and medial meniscus tears left in situ at the time of ACL reconstruction did not require reoperation at a minimum 6-year follow-up for 97.8% and 94.4% of tears, respectively. These findings re-emphasize the low reoperation rate after the nontreatment of small, peripheral lateral meniscus tears while noting less predictable results for medial meniscus tears left without treatment.
在初次前交叉韧带(ACL)重建时发现的半月板撕裂的处理方式差异很大,包括修复、半月板切除术和不治疗。
假设/目的:本研究的目的是确定在ACL重建时未治疗的半月板撕裂的再次手术率,最短随访时间为6年。假设是在ACL重建时发现的小的周边撕裂采用“不治疗”的方式会获得成功的临床结果。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
从一个多中心研究组中确定在初次ACL重建时未治疗的半月板撕裂患者,最短随访6年。获取患者、撕裂情况和再次手术的数据进行分析。将再次手术的需求作为主要终点,进行分析以确定与再次手术相关的患者和撕裂特征。
有194例患者的208处半月板撕裂(71处内侧,137处外侧)未进行治疗而留作原位观察,并进行了完整的随访分析。其中,97.8%的外侧未治疗撕裂和94.4%的内侧未治疗撕裂不需要再次手术。16处(7.7%)未治疗而留作原位观察的撕裂随后进行了再次手术:9处(4.3%)在ACL翻修重建时进行了再次手术,7处(3.4%)因孤立的半月板损伤进行了再次手术。需要再次手术的患者年龄显著更低,而长度≥10 mm的撕裂更频繁地需要再次手术。
在ACL重建时留作原位观察的外侧和内侧半月板撕裂,在最短6年的随访中,分别有97.8%和94.4%的撕裂不需要再次手术。这些发现再次强调了小的周边外侧半月板撕裂不治疗后的低再次手术率,同时指出内侧半月板撕裂不治疗的结果较难预测。