Cippà Pietro E, Schiesser Marc, Ekberg Henrik, van Gelder Teun, Mueller Nicolas J, Cao Claude A, Fehr Thomas, Bernasconi Corrado
Divisions of Nephrology.
Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, and.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):2213-20. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01790215. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Definition of individual risk profile is the first step to implement strategies to keep the delicate balance between under- and overimmunosuppression after kidney transplantation.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We used data from the Efficacy Limiting Toxicity Elimination Symphony Study (1190 patients between 2002 and 2004) to model risk of rejection and infection in the first year after kidney transplantation. External validation was performed in a study population from the Fixed-Dose Concentration-Controlled Trial (630 patients between 2003 and 2006).
Despite different temporal dynamics, rejections and severe infections had similar overall incidences in the first year after transplantation (23.4% and 25.5%, respectively), and infections were the principal cause of death (43.2% of all deaths). Recipient older age, deceased donor, higher number of HLA mismatches, and high risk for cytomegalovirus disease were associated with infection; deceased donor, higher number of HLA mismatches, and immunosuppressive therapy including cyclosporin A (compared with tacrolimus), with rejection. These factors were integrated into a two-dimensional risk stratification model, which defined four risk groups: low risk for infection and rejection (30.8%), isolated risk for rejection (36.1%), isolated risk for infection (7.0%), and high risk for infection and rejection (26.1%). In internal validation, this model significantly discriminated the subgroups in terms of composite end point (low risk for infection/rejection, 24.4%; isolated risk for rejection and isolated risk for infection, 31.3%; high risk for infection/rejection, 54.4%; P<0.001), rejection episodes (isolated risk for infection and low risk for infection/rejection, 13.0%; isolated risk for rejection and high risk for infection/rejection, 24.2%; P=0.001), and infection episodes (low risk for infection/rejection and isolated risk for rejection, 12.0%; isolated risk for infection and high risk for infection/rejection, 37.6%; P<0.001). External validation confirmed the applicability of the model to an independent cohort.
We propose a two-dimensional risk stratification model able to disentangle the individual risk for rejection and infection in the first year after kidney transplantation. This concept can be applied to implement a personalized immunosuppressive and antimicrobial treatment approach.
定义个体风险概况是实施策略以维持肾移植后免疫抑制不足与过度之间微妙平衡的第一步。
设计、地点、参与者及测量方法:我们使用了疗效限制毒性消除交响乐研究(2002年至2004年间的1190例患者)的数据来模拟肾移植后第一年排斥反应和感染的风险。在固定剂量浓度对照试验(2003年至2006年间的630例患者)的研究人群中进行了外部验证。
尽管时间动态不同,但移植后第一年排斥反应和严重感染的总体发生率相似(分别为23.4%和25.5%),且感染是主要死因(占所有死亡的43.2%)。受者年龄较大、供者死亡、HLA错配数量较多以及巨细胞病毒病高风险与感染相关;供者死亡、HLA错配数量较多以及包括环孢素A(与他克莫司相比)的免疫抑制治疗与排斥反应相关。这些因素被整合到一个二维风险分层模型中,该模型定义了四个风险组:感染和排斥反应低风险(30.8%)、孤立的排斥反应风险(36.1%)、孤立的感染风险(7.0%)以及感染和排斥反应高风险(26.1%)。在内部验证中,该模型在复合终点方面显著区分了亚组(感染/排斥反应低风险,24.4%;孤立的排斥反应风险和孤立的感染风险,31.3%;感染/排斥反应高风险,54.4%;P<0.001)、排斥反应发作(孤立的感染风险和感染/排斥反应低风险,13.0%;孤立的排斥反应风险和感染/排斥反应高风险,24.2%;P=0.001)以及感染发作(感染/排斥反应低风险和孤立的排斥反应风险,12.0%;孤立的感染风险和感染/排斥反应高风险,37.6%;P<0.001)。外部验证证实了该模型对独立队列的适用性。
我们提出了一个二维风险分层模型,能够区分肾移植后第一年个体的排斥反应和感染风险。这一概念可应用于实施个性化的免疫抑制和抗菌治疗方法。