Inaba S, Sato H, Okochi K, Fukada K, Takakura F, Tokunaga K, Kiyokawa H, Maeda Y
Blood Transfusion Service, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Transfusion. 1989 Jan;29(1):7-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29189101168.x.
To prevent the transmission of human T-lymphotropic virus, type 1 (HTLV-1) during blood transfusion, a program was implemented to screen donors for antibodies to the virus, using a newly developed, passive agglutination (PA) method. During the period April 1986 to March 1987, 675 recipients of donor blood in whom the antibody to HTLV-1 was not present before transfusion were followed for at least 50 days after transfusion. One of these 675 seroconverted despite the transfusion of screened blood, but this seroconversion rate (0.15%) represents a marked decrease from the rate of 8.3 percent prevalent before donor screening began. The rate in the Fukuoka area of donors seropositive for anti-HTLV-1 is 5.34 percent, as detected by the PA method and 1.80 percent, as assessed by the indirect immunofluorescence (IF) technique, with PA-positive but IF-negative blood units thus accounting for 3.5 percent (5.34-1.80) of the total blood donated. The seroconversion rate among recipients transfused with blood screened by IF (at Kyushu University Hospital only) from 1981 to 1985 was 0.41 percent, which was not significantly different from the rate of 0.15 percent observed after PA screening. The discrepancy between PA and IF in the rate of seropositivity was due, in part, to the higher sensitivity of PA in detecting anti-HTLV-1. It is proposed that all donor blood in areas where HTLV-1 is endemic be screened by PA before transfusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为防止输血过程中1型人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒(HTLV-1)的传播,实施了一项计划,采用新开发的被动凝集(PA)法对献血者进行病毒抗体筛查。在1986年4月至1987年3月期间,对675名输血前不存在HTLV-1抗体的受血者进行了至少50天的随访。这675人中,有一人尽管输了经过筛查的血液仍发生了血清转化,但这种血清转化率(0.15%)与献血者筛查开始前8.3%的流行率相比显著下降。通过PA法检测,福冈地区抗HTLV-1血清阳性的献血者比例为5.34%,通过间接免疫荧光(IF)技术评估为1.80%,因此PA阳性但IF阴性的血液单位占总献血量的3.5%(5.34 - 1.80)。1981年至1985年期间,在九州大学医院仅接受IF筛查血液的受血者中,血清转化率为0.41%,与PA筛查后观察到的0.15%的比率无显著差异。PA和IF在血清阳性率上的差异部分归因于PA在检测抗HTLV-1方面具有更高的敏感性。建议在HTLV-1流行地区,所有献血在输血前都采用PA法进行筛查。(摘要截短至250字)