Mihara Kyomi, Nomiyama Tomoko, Masuda Koji, Shindo Hajime, Yasumi Maki, Sawada Takahiro, Nagasaki Kotaro, Katoh Norito
Burns Unit, Nagasaki Hospital, 3-11, Yokogawa-Shinmachi, Nishi-ku, Hiroshima City 733-0013, Japan; Department of Dermatology, Nagasaki Hospital, 3-11, Yokogawa-Shinmachi, Nishi-ku, Hiroshima City 733-0013, Japan.
Department of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, 465, Kajii-Cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto City 602-8566, Japan.
Burns. 2015 Dec;41(8):1708-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
To investigate the effectiveness of dermoscopic observation of skin microcirculation, the dermal capillary integrity of burn wounds was evaluated by dermoscopy according to a proposed algorithm that is designed to distinguish burn wounds between superficial dermal burns: SDB, and deep dermal burns: DDB. As the gold standard for comparison, two widely accepted endpoints of primary healing within 21 days (SDB) or over 21 days after injury (DDB) were used. A number of dermatologists conducted diagnostic imaging by dermoscopy. Comparison among polarized noncontact dermoscopy (PNCD), polarized contact dermoscopy (PCD) and nonpolarized contact dermoscopy (NPD) was also conducted. Images from the three modalities were evaluated for color, pattern and qualitative differences among them. The results of dermoscopy measurements according to the proposed algorithm showed accuracy of 96.7%, sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 94.4%. Dermoscopy measurements were significantly more accurate than clinical assessment (p<0.05). The recognition of dots increased for NPD, vessels were most clearly observed under PCD and colours tended to be more distinctly recognized under polarized light. Dermoscopy is a useful and simple tool to evaluate not only epidermal and superficial dermal skin components but also the skin microcirculation.
为了研究皮肤微循环的皮肤镜观察效果,根据一种旨在区分浅度真皮烧伤(SDB)和深度真皮烧伤(DDB)的烧伤创面的算法,通过皮肤镜评估烧伤创面的真皮毛细血管完整性。作为比较的金标准,采用了两个被广泛接受的主要愈合终点,即伤后21天内愈合(SDB)或伤后21天以上愈合(DDB)。多位皮肤科医生通过皮肤镜进行诊断成像。还对偏振非接触皮肤镜(PNCD)、偏振接触皮肤镜(PCD)和非偏振接触皮肤镜(NPD)进行了比较。对这三种模式的图像进行了颜色、图案和它们之间定性差异的评估。根据所提出的算法进行的皮肤镜测量结果显示,准确率为96.7%,灵敏度为100.0%,特异性为94.4%。皮肤镜测量比临床评估显著更准确(p<0.05)。NPD对斑点的识别增加,PCD下血管观察最清晰,偏振光下颜色往往更易识别。皮肤镜不仅是评估表皮和浅度真皮皮肤成分的有用且简单的工具,也是评估皮肤微循环的有用工具。