• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构中的住院率和死亡率:营利性质有关系吗?

Hospitalization and Mortality Rates in Long-Term Care Facilities: Does For-Profit Status Matter?

作者信息

Tanuseputro Peter, Chalifoux Mathieu, Bennett Carol, Gruneir Andrea, Bronskill Susan E, Walker Peter, Manuel Douglas

机构信息

Bruyère Research Institute, Bruyère Centre of Learning, Research and Innovation in Long-Term Care, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Oct 1;16(10):874-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.004
PMID:26433862
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish if proprietary status (ie, for-profit or not-for-profit) is associated with mortality and hospitalizations among publicly funded long-term care (nursing) homes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of new admissions in 640 publicly funded long-term care facilities in Ontario, Canada (384 for-profit, 256 not-for-profit). A population-based cohort of 53,739 incident admissions into long-term care facilities between January 1, 2010, and March 1, 2012, was observed. We measured adjusted rates of hospital admissions and mortality, per 1000 person-years (PY) of follow-up, among for-profit and not-for-profit facilities at 3, 6, and 12 months postadmission. Rates were measured postadmission and until discharge or death, whichever came first.

RESULTS

One year after admission and before discharge, 11.7% of residents died and 25.7% had at least one hospitalization. After 12 months of follow-up, residents in for-profit facilities had a hospitalization rate of 462 per 1000 PY versus 358 per 1000 PY in not-for-profit facilities. During this period, the crude mortality rate in for-profit facilities was 208 per 1000 PY versus 185 per 1000 PY in not-for-profit facilities. At 3, 6, and 1 year after admission, for-profit facilities had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.43), 1.33 (95% CI 1.27-1.39), and 1.25 (95% CI 1.21-1.30) for hospitalizations and hazards of 1.20 (95% CI 1.11-1.29), 1.16 (95% CI 1.09-1.24), and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16) for mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Publicly funded for-profit facilities have significantly higher rates of both mortality and hospital admissions.

摘要

目的

确定所有权性质(即营利性或非营利性)是否与公共资助的长期护理(疗养院)机构中的死亡率和住院率相关。

方法

我们对加拿大安大略省640家公共资助的长期护理机构中的新入院患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究(384家营利性机构,256家非营利性机构)。观察了2010年1月1日至2012年3月1日期间以人群为基础的53739例长期护理机构入院事件队列。我们测量了营利性和非营利性机构入院后3个月、6个月和12个月时每1000人年随访的调整后住院率和死亡率。入院后直至出院或死亡(以先发生者为准)测量率。

结果

入院一年后且出院前,11.7%的居民死亡,25.7%的居民至少有一次住院。随访12个月后,营利性机构居民的住院率为每1000人年462例,而非营利性机构为每1000人年358例。在此期间,营利性机构的粗死亡率为每1000人年208例,而非营利性机构为每1000人年185例。入院后3个月、6个月和1年时,营利性机构住院的调整后风险比分别为1.36(95%置信区间[CI]1.28 - 1.43)、1.33(95%CI 1.27 - 1.39)和1.25(95%CI 1.21 - 1.30),死亡风险分别为1.20(95%CI 1.11 - 1.29)、1.16(95%CI 1.09 - 1.24)和1.10(95%CI 1.05 - 1.16)。

结论

公共资助的营利性机构的死亡率和住院率显著更高。

相似文献

1
Hospitalization and Mortality Rates in Long-Term Care Facilities: Does For-Profit Status Matter?长期护理机构中的住院率和死亡率:营利性质有关系吗?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Oct 1;16(10):874-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.004.
2
Long-Term Care Facility Ownership and Acute Hospital Service Use in British Columbia, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.长期护理机构所有权与不列颠哥伦比亚省加拿大急性医院服务使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Oct;21(10):1490-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Comparison of hospitalization rates among for-profit and nonprofit dialysis facilities.营利性和非营利性透析机构住院率的比较。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Jan;9(1):73-81. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04200413. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
4
Care outcomes in long-term care facilities in British Columbia, Canada. Does ownership matter?加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省长期护理机构的护理结果。所有权重要吗?
Med Care. 2006 Oct;44(10):929-35. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000223477.98594.97.
5
Do-Not-Resuscitate and Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders in Nursing Homes: Who Gets Them and Do They Make a Difference?《疗养院中的不复苏和不住院医嘱:谁会得到它们,它们有区别吗?》
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Sep;20(9):1169-1174.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
One-year survival and admission to hospital for cardiovascular events among older residents of long-term care facilities who were prescribed intensive- and moderate-dose statins.长期护理机构中接受强化和中等剂量他汀类药物治疗的老年居民的一年生存率和心血管事件住院率。
CMAJ. 2019 Jan 14;191(2):E32-E39. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180853.
7
Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?非营利性和营利性长期护理机构的人员配备水平:所有权类型重要吗?
CMAJ. 2005 Mar 1;172(5):645-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040131.
8
Observations on institutional long-term care in Ontario: 1996-2002.安大略省机构长期护理观察:1996 - 2002年
Can J Aging. 2005 Spring;24(1):70-84.
9
Burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Medicare beneficiaries residing in long-term care facilities.长期护理机构中医疗保险受益人的慢性阻塞性肺疾病负担
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;7(5):262-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.11.003.
10
Long-term outcomes and resource utilization of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Ontario.安大略省腹主动脉瘤腔内修复与开放修复的长期结局和资源利用比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):577-83, 583.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.101. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in emergency department visits among residents of Swedish nursing homes between 2019 and 2020, a population-based cohort study.2019年至2020年瑞典养老院居民急诊就诊情况的变化:一项基于人群的队列研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 10;25(1):1196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13443-9.
2
Association of loneliness with healthcare transitions and mortality in older adults in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大安大略省老年人孤独感与医疗保健过渡及死亡率的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 22;15(4):e087804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087804.
3
Examining Quality of Work Life in Atlantic Canadian Long-Term Care Homes: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
考察加拿大大西洋地区长期护理院的工作生活质量:一项横断面调查研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 31;14:e66338. doi: 10.2196/66338.
4
Palliative care consultation teams in long-term care: a descriptive retrospective cohort study.长期护理中的姑息治疗咨询团队:一项描述性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 22;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01716-3.
5
Variations in Prescribing Rates of End-of-Life Medications Among Long-Term Care Residents in Alberta Compared with Ontario-a Retrospective Cohort Study.与安大略省相比,艾伯塔省长期护理居民临终药物处方率的差异——一项回顾性队列研究。
Can Geriatr J. 2025 Mar 1;28(1):31-40. doi: 10.5770/cgj.28.811. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Commentary: Critical to Care - The Problem of Profit in Ontario's Long-Term Care Home Sector.评论:护理的关键——安大略省长期护理院行业的利润问题。
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;20(1):41-46. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27483.
7
Hospitalizations, emergency medical care utilization, and contacts with the regional on-call medical services among nursing home residents in Germany: a cross-sectional study in 44 nursing homes.德国养老院居民的住院情况、急诊医疗服务利用情况以及与地区随叫随到医疗服务的接触情况:对44家养老院的横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12342-3.
8
Transfer from long-term care to acute care and risk of new permanent cognitive or physical disability among long-term care residents in Canada: protocol for a retrospective cohort study.加拿大长期护理机构居民从长期护理向急性护理的转移以及新的永久性认知或身体残疾风险:一项回顾性队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086932.
9
Sex differences in the associations of accelerometer-determined physical activity with physical and cognitive function in older adults living in long-term care.长期护理中老年人身体活动与身体和认知功能的关联在性别上的差异:基于加速度计的测量。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;12:1446286. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1446286. eCollection 2024.
10
Patient Profile and Cost Savings of Long-Term Care in a Spanish Hospital: Retrospective Observational Study.西班牙一家医院长期护理的患者概况与成本节约:回顾性观察研究
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Nov 19;13:e64248. doi: 10.2196/64248.