Hernefalk Björn, Eriksson Niclas, Borg Tomas, Larsson Sune
Department of Orthopedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
Evaluation of patient-assessed functional outcome in traumatic conditions has specific challenges. To obtain pre-traumatic data to allow for comparison during follow-up, retrospective assessments are needed. How such data is affected by posttraumatic time-point chosen for evaluation is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate how the time-point chosen for retrospective assessment of pre-traumatic quality of life (QoL) in patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures and pelvic ring injuries influenced the results. A secondary purpose was to examine the pre-traumatic QoL-profile in patients with these injuries.
73 patients were included, where 50 had an acetabular fracture and 23 a pelvic ring injury. Pre-traumatic QoL was evaluated using the generic instruments SF-36 and EQ5D in conjunction with the condition-specific Pelvic Trauma Questionnaire (PTQ). Questionnaires were completed at three time points: 0, 1 and 2 months post-surgery.
Number of responders were 73 patients at 0 months, 61 patients at 1 month and 53 patients at 2 months. 50 patients answered the questionnaires at all three time-points. A trend was observed with all instruments where patients estimated a better pre-traumatic status with narrower distributions when assessment was delayed. At 2 months, scores for 4 out of 8 SF-36 domains where significantly higher compared to 0 months. For EQ5D, EQ VAS improved at 1 and 2 months compared to month 0 results but no other significant differences between time-points were found. Results from the PTQ demonstrated no significant differences over time. Pre-traumatic quality of life was high and for SF-36 comparable to a population norm. A very low level of pre-existing discomfort from the pelvic region was reported through the PTQ.
Patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures and pelvic ring injuries estimate a higher pre-traumatic functional status when assessment is carried out at 1 or 2 months post-surgery compared to perioperative measurements. The SF-36 seems to be more sensitive than the EQ5D in this respect. Pre-traumatic QoL in patients with surgically treated acetabular fractures and pelvic ring injuries is generally high and pre-existing discomfort from the pelvic region is uncommon.
评估创伤情况下患者自我评估的功能结局存在特殊挑战。为获取创伤前数据以便在随访期间进行比较,需要进行回顾性评估。此类数据如何受到所选创伤后评估时间点的影响尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是调查为接受手术治疗的髋臼骨折和骨盆环损伤患者进行创伤前生活质量(QoL)回顾性评估时所选时间点如何影响结果。次要目的是检查这些损伤患者的创伤前QoL概况。
纳入73例患者,其中50例为髋臼骨折,23例为骨盆环损伤。使用通用工具SF - 36和EQ5D结合特定病情的骨盆创伤问卷(PTQ)评估创伤前QoL。问卷在三个时间点完成:术后0、1和2个月。
0个月时73例患者回复,1个月时61例患者回复,2个月时53例患者回复。50例患者在所有三个时间点都回答了问卷。所有工具均观察到一种趋势,即当评估延迟时,患者估计创伤前状态更好且分布更窄。在2个月时,与0个月相比,SF - 36的8个领域中有4个领域的得分显著更高。对于EQ5D,EQ VAS在1个月和2个月时相比0个月结果有所改善,但未发现时间点之间的其他显著差异。PTQ的结果未显示随时间有显著差异。创伤前生活质量较高,SF - 36与人群常模相当。通过PTQ报告的骨盆区域既往不适水平非常低。
与围手术期测量相比,接受手术治疗的髋臼骨折和骨盆环损伤患者在术后1或2个月进行评估时,估计创伤前功能状态更高。在这方面,SF - 36似乎比EQ5D更敏感。接受手术治疗的髋臼骨折和骨盆环损伤患者的创伤前QoL通常较高,骨盆区域既往不适并不常见。