Kwon Joo Young, Kim Na-Young, Suh Dae C, Kang Dong-Wha, Kwon Sun U, Kim Jong S
Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Neuroradiology, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Nov 15;358(1-2):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.368. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Background and purpose Although cervicocranial artery dissections (CADs) are common causes of ischemic stroke in young individuals, anatomical locations and mechanisms of ischemic strokes are still unclear. We evaluate the prevalence, location, and pathogenic mechanisms of ischemic stroke caused by CADs.
We reviewed CAD patients who presented with acute (<7days) ischemic events and who had undergone diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and appropriate vascular imagings (MR angiography, computed tomography angiography, digital subtraction angiography, and high-resolution MRI). Stroke mechanisms were categorized as artery-to-artery (AA) embolism, local branch occlusion, in situ thrombotic occlusion and hemodynamic impairment.
One hundred and thirty-five patients with cerebral infarcts (n=125) or transient ischemic attacks (n=10) were included. The locations of 159 dissected vessels were: 77 vertebral, 29 internal carotid, 24 middle cerebral, 12 basilar, eight posterior inferior cerebellar, five anterior cerebral, and four posterior cerebral arteries. Among stroke mechanisms, A-A embolism (n=70, 55.5%) was the most common followed by local branch occlusions (n=40, 31.7%) and in situ thrombotic occlusions (n=8, 6.3%). Intracranial CADs were more common (89 vs. 44), less often associated with trauma (21.3% vs. 40.9%, p=0.018) and A-A embolism (32.9% vs. 97.6%, p<0.001), and more often treated with intravenous thrombolysis (15.7% vs. 2.3%. p=0.021) than extracranial CADs.
In our cohort, intracranial CADs are more common than extracranial CADs, and the vertebral artery is the most frequently involved site. Although A-A embolism is the main stroke mechanism, local branch occlusion is another important stroke mechanism.
背景与目的 尽管颈颅动脉夹层(CADs)是年轻个体缺血性卒中的常见病因,但缺血性卒中的解剖位置和机制仍不明确。我们评估了由CADs导致的缺血性卒中的患病率、位置及致病机制。
我们回顾了出现急性(<7天)缺血性事件且接受了弥散加权磁共振成像(MRI)及适当血管成像检查(磁共振血管造影、计算机断层血管造影、数字减影血管造影和高分辨率MRI)的CAD患者。卒中机制分为动脉到动脉(AA)栓塞、局部分支闭塞、原位血栓形成闭塞和血流动力学损害。
纳入了135例脑梗死患者(n = 125)或短暂性脑缺血发作患者(n = 10)。159条夹层血管的位置分别为:77条椎动脉、29条颈内动脉、24条大脑中动脉、12条基底动脉、8条小脑后下动脉、5条大脑前动脉和4条大脑后动脉。在卒中机制中,AA栓塞(n = 70,55.5%)最为常见,其次是局部分支闭塞(n = 40,31.7%)和原位血栓形成闭塞(n = 8,6.3%)。颅内CADs更常见(89例对44例),与创伤相关的情况较少(21.3%对40.9%,p = 0.018),与AA栓塞相关的情况也较少(32.9%对97.6%,p < 0.001),并且与颅外CADs相比,接受静脉溶栓治疗的比例更高(15.7%对2.3%,p = 0.021)。
在我们的队列中,颅内CADs比颅外CADs更常见,椎动脉是最常受累的部位。虽然AA栓塞是主要的卒中机制,但局部分支闭塞是另一个重要的卒中机制。