De Roo Pieter-Jan, Muermans Stijn, Maroy Mathieu, Linden Patrick, Van den Daelen Luc
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Sep;81(3):485-92.
This prospective randomized study compares the clinical results of immediate passive mobilization versus delayed mobilization in the rehabilitation of rotator cuff repair during the early postoperative period. The mobilization group (79 patients) received immediate daily passive mobilization. The immobilization group (51 patients) was immobilized for 4 weeks until physiotherapy was started. Passive range of motion was noted preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 4 months. Strength was measured preoperatively and at 4 months. Constant-Murley, Simple Shoulder Test, SPADI and UCLA scores were noted at baseline and at 4 months. Ultrasonography was performed at 6 weeks to exclude early failures of repair. We noted no significant difference between the two groups regarding range of motion at 6 weeks and range of motion, strength and functional outcome scores at 4 months. Ultrasound didn't show a difference in healing at 6 w in either of both groups. Both rehabilitation protocols seem applicable as well as safe in the early post-operative phase.
这项前瞻性随机研究比较了在术后早期肩袖修复康复中立即进行被动活动与延迟活动的临床结果。活动组(79例患者)每天立即接受被动活动。固定组(51例患者)固定4周,直到开始物理治疗。术前、6周和4个月时记录被动活动范围。术前和4个月时测量力量。在基线和4个月时记录Constant-Murley、简单肩部测试、SPADI和UCLA评分。在6周时进行超声检查以排除早期修复失败。我们注意到两组在6周时的活动范围以及4个月时的活动范围、力量和功能结果评分方面没有显著差异。超声显示两组在6周时愈合情况均无差异。两种康复方案在术后早期似乎都是适用且安全的。