Suppr超能文献

三大指南关于剖宫产术后药物性血栓栓塞预防建议的比较

A comparison of recommendations for pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis after caesarean delivery from three major guidelines.

作者信息

Palmerola K L, D'Alton M E, Brock C O, Friedman A M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2157-2162. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13706. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for pharmacologic obstetric venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis from the American Congress of Obstetricians (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and the American College of Chest Physicians (Chest) vary significantly. The objective of this study was to determine the practical implications of these recommendations in terms of prophylaxis rates for a tertiary obstetric population.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

POPULATION

Patients post-operative day 1 after caesarean delivery.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study evaluated rates of pharmacologic prophylaxis for women based on RCOG, ACOG, and Chest recommendations. Medical, obstetric, and demographic risk factors for thromboembolism were reviewed for individual patients. Rates of prophylaxis based on each of the guidelines with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Recommended pharmacologic prophylaxis.

RESULTS

About 293 patients were included in the analysis. Under RCOG guidelines, 85.0% of patients would receive post-caesarean pharmacologic prophylaxis [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.5-88.6%] compared with 1.0% of patients under ACOG guidelines (95% CI 0.3-3.0%) and 34.8% of patients under Chest guidelines (95% CI 29.6-40.4%). Caesarean during labour, obesity, advanced maternal age, pre-eclampsia, and multiple gestation were among the most commonrisk factors.

CONCLUSION

Recommended prophylaxis differed significantly. Under ACOG recommendations a small minority of patients would receive prophylaxis, whereas under RCOG recommendations a large majority of patients would receive low-molecular-weight heparin. Given the large differences in prophylaxis rates for post-caesarean thromboprophylaxis based on different guidelines, further research is urgently needed to compare the risks and benefits of recommendations.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Recommendations from major society guidelines for post-caesarean thromboprophylaxis differ greatly.

摘要

目的

美国妇产科医师大会(ACOG)、皇家妇产科医师学院(RCOG)以及美国胸科医师学会(Chest)发布的产科静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)药物预防指南差异显著。本研究的目的是确定这些建议对于三级产科人群预防率的实际影响。

研究设计

横断面研究。

研究地点

三级转诊医院。

研究对象

剖宫产术后第1天的患者。

方法

这项横断面研究根据RCOG、ACOG和Chest的建议评估了女性药物预防率。对个体患者的血栓栓塞的医学、产科和人口统计学风险因素进行了回顾。计算了基于每种指南并带有95%置信区间的预防率。

观察指标

推荐的药物预防措施。

结果

约293例患者纳入分析。根据RCOG指南,85.0%的患者剖宫产术后会接受药物预防[95%置信区间(CI)80.5 - 88.6%],相比之下,根据ACOG指南为1.0%的患者(95% CI 0.3 - 3.0%),根据Chest指南为34.8%的患者(95% CI 29.6 - 40.4%)。产时剖宫产、肥胖、高龄产妇、先兆子痫和多胎妊娠是最常见的风险因素。

结论

推荐的预防措施差异显著。根据ACOG建议,只有一小部分患者会接受预防,而根据RCOG建议,绝大多数患者会接受低分子量肝素预防。鉴于不同指南下剖宫产血栓预防率存在巨大差异,迫切需要进一步研究来比较这些建议的风险和益处。

可发推文摘要

主要学会指南中关于剖宫产术后血栓预防的建议差异极大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验