Paziewska-Harris Anna, Singer Martin, Schoone Gerard, Schallig Henk
KIT Biomedical Research, Royal Tropical Institute, Meibergdreef 39, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Current address: Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Parasitol Res. 2016 Jan;115(1):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4751-1. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Cryptosporidium is an important waterborne pathogen for which no treatment or vaccination is available. This study set out to quantify DNA replication of Cryptosporidium parvum in vitro. Cryptosporidium DNA could be detected at up to 60 % of input level in both host-cell-free and host cell containing cultures 6 days after infection with living sporozoites, but was lost within 2 days in cultures inoculated with UV-inactivated sporozoites. Total DNA increased between days 2 and 6, evidence of successful DNA replication in both cell-free and host-cell-containing cultures. Overall however, only a small fraction (up to 5 %) of parasite DNA could be found associated with host cells or bound to plastic of the cell-free cultures, and the majority of parasite DNA was present in the cell culture medium, separable by simple decantation. After 2 days, in host-cell-containing cultures, the parasite DNA could be concentrated by slow centrifugation, suggesting that it was associated with intact parasite cells, but at 6 days, the majority could not be centrifuged and is therefore thought to have represented copies associated with dead and degraded parasites. In cell-free cultures and in larger plates, the majority of DNA was in this form. Performance of the parasite was best in small culture plates, and least in the largest plate sizes. We interpret these results as suggesting that Cryptosporidium sporozoites first bind to the host cell monolayer or to the plasticware, but then by 2 days, there has been a substantial release of parasites back into the medium. Host-cell-free cultures also supported modest replication and may have represented DNA synthesis in cells beginning merogony. The role of the host cells is unclear, as so much of the parasite DNA is released into the medium. Host cells may provide a feeder role, conditioning the medium for Cryptosporidium development.
隐孢子虫是一种重要的水源性病原体,目前尚无有效的治疗方法或疫苗。本研究旨在定量检测微小隐孢子虫在体外的DNA复制情况。在用活子孢子感染6天后,在无宿主细胞和含宿主细胞的培养物中均可检测到隐孢子虫DNA,其含量最高可达输入水平的60%,但在用紫外线灭活的子孢子接种的培养物中,DNA在2天内就消失了。总DNA在第2天至第6天之间增加,这证明在无细胞和含宿主细胞的培养物中均成功进行了DNA复制。然而,总体而言,仅能发现一小部分(最高5%)的寄生虫DNA与宿主细胞相关或与无细胞培养物的塑料表面结合,而大部分寄生虫DNA存在于细胞培养基中,可通过简单倾析分离。2天后,在含宿主细胞的培养物中,寄生虫DNA可通过低速离心浓缩,这表明它与完整的寄生虫细胞相关,但在6天时,大部分无法离心,因此被认为代表了与死亡和降解的寄生虫相关的拷贝。在无细胞培养物和较大的平板中,大部分DNA都是这种形式。寄生虫在小培养平板中的表现最佳,而在最大尺寸的平板中表现最差。我们将这些结果解释为表明隐孢子虫子孢子首先与宿主细胞单层或塑料制品结合,但到第2天时,大量寄生虫已释放回培养基中。无宿主细胞的培养物也支持适度的复制,可能代表了开始进行裂殖生殖的细胞中的DNA合成。宿主细胞的作用尚不清楚,因为大量寄生虫DNA被释放到培养基中。宿主细胞可能起到了滋养作用,为隐孢子虫的发育调节培养基。