• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的爱泼斯坦标准在希腊亚人群中对微小前列腺癌预测的验证。

Validation of revised Epstein's criteria for insignificant prostate cancer prediction in a Greek subpopulation.

作者信息

Chondros Κ, Karpathakis Ν, Heretis Ι, Mavromanolakis Ε, Chondros N, Sofras F, Mamoulakis C

机构信息

Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Hippokratia. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):30-3.

PMID:26435643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4574582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different treatment options for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) are applicable after stratifying patients according to various classification criteria. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the revised Epstein's criteria for insignificant PCa prediction in a Greek subpopulation.

METHODS

During a 4-year-period, 172 Cretan patients were submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy in our institution. 23 out of them met the revised Epstein's criteria for the presence of clinically insignificant PCa (clinical stage T1c, prostate specific antigen density < 0.15 ng/ml/g, absence of Gleason pattern 4-5, <3 positive biopsy cores, presence of <50% tumor per core) during pre-treatment evaluation and were retrospectively included in the study. Post-surgery outcomes were evaluated including pathological stage, surgical margins and Gleason score upgrade.

RESULTS

Organ confined disease and insignificant PCa were predicted with a 74% and 31% accuracy, respectively. These figures are remarkably lower than those derived from similar studies worldwide.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the high variation in the revised Epstein's criteria prediction accuracy observed worldwide, the development and implementation of novel tools/nomograms with a greater predictive accuracy is still warranted. Hippokratia 2015, 19 (1): 30-33.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌(PCa)患者的不同治疗方案适用于根据各种分类标准对患者进行分层后。我们研究的目的是在希腊亚人群中评估修订后的爱泼斯坦标准对微小前列腺癌预测的效果。

方法

在4年期间,172名克里特岛患者在我们机构接受了耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术。其中23名患者在治疗前评估中符合修订后的爱泼斯坦标准,即存在临床微小前列腺癌(临床分期T1c,前列腺特异性抗原密度<0.15 ng/ml/g,无Gleason 4-5级模式,阳性活检核心<3个,每个核心肿瘤<50%),并被回顾性纳入研究。评估术后结果,包括病理分期、手术切缘和Gleason评分升级。

结果

器官局限性疾病和微小前列腺癌的预测准确率分别为74%和31%。这些数字明显低于全球类似研究得出的数字。

结论

由于全球范围内观察到修订后的爱泼斯坦标准预测准确率差异很大,因此仍有必要开发和实施具有更高预测准确率的新型工具/列线图。《希波克拉底》2015年,第19卷(第1期):30 - 33页。

相似文献

1
Validation of revised Epstein's criteria for insignificant prostate cancer prediction in a Greek subpopulation.修订后的爱泼斯坦标准在希腊亚人群中对微小前列腺癌预测的验证。
Hippokratia. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):30-3.
2
Predictive criteria of insignificant prostate cancer: what is the correspondence of linear extent to percentage of cancer in a single core?微小前列腺癌的预测标准:单个组织芯中线性范围与癌百分比之间的对应关系是什么?
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Mar-Apr;41(2):367-72. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.26.
3
Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1C adenocarcinoma of the prostate.前列腺T1C期腺癌男性患者的前瞻性评估。
J Urol. 1997 Jun;157(6):2206-9.
4
Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?在适合进行主动监测的患者中,前列腺活检中的累积前列腺癌长度(CCL)能否改善对根治性前列腺切除术中临床意义不显著癌症的预测?
BJU Int. 2015 Aug;116(2):220-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12880. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
5
Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.临床分期为T1c与T2的前列腺腺癌根治性前列腺切除术的病理参数:病理分期降低及移行区肿瘤检出率增加。
J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):519-24.
6
Obligatory information that a patient diagnosed of prostate cancer and candidate for an active surveillance protocol must know.被诊断患有前列腺癌且适合积极监测方案的患者必须知晓的必要信息。
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Nov;38(9):559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
7
Perineural invasion and TRUS findings are complementary in predicting prostate cancer biology.神经周围浸润和经直肠超声检查结果在预测前列腺癌生物学特性方面具有互补性。
Can J Urol. 2013 Apr;20(2):6696-701.
8
Outcome of radical prostatectomy in patients meeting criteria for active surveillance.
Arch Esp Urol. 2013 May;66(4):342-9.
9
Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings.不可触及的T1c期前列腺癌:利用游离/总前列腺特异性抗原水平和穿刺活检结果预测微小疾病
J Urol. 1998 Dec;160(6 Pt 2):2407-11.
10
Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.对因临床器官局限性疾病接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性中潜在意义不显著的前列腺癌进行预测。
Int J Urol. 2005 Mar;12(3):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01041.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate Cancer Detection with mpMRI According to PI-RADS v2 Compared with Systematic MRI/TRUS-Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Study.基于 PI-RADS v2 的 mpMRI 对前列腺癌的检测与系统 MRI/TRUS-融合活检的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Tomography. 2022 Aug 16;8(4):2020-2029. doi: 10.3390/tomography8040169.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.当代前列腺癌患者主动监测选择标准的诊断准确性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:810736. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810736. eCollection 2021.
3
Necessity of differentiating small (< 10 mm) and large (≥ 10 mm) PI-RADS 4.有必要对 PI-RADS 4 评分小(< 10mm)和大(≥ 10mm)的前列腺癌进行区分。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1473-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02924-2. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Are clinically insignificant prostate cancers really insignificant among Korean men?韩国男性的临床意义不显著的前列腺癌真的不显著吗?
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):358-62. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.358.
2
Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy as a staging procedure to select patients best suited for active surveillance.经会阴模板引导定位活检作为一种分期方法,可选择最适合主动监测的患者。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr;36(2):116-20. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31823fe639.
3
The relationship between Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) and prostate cancer significance.前列腺癌基因 3(PCA3)与前列腺癌的关系及其意义。
BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):360-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10377.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
4
Effect of intra-observer variation in prostate volume measurement on prostate-specific antigen density calculations among prostate cancer active surveillance participants.前列腺体积测量的观察者内变异对前列腺癌主动监测参与者中前列腺特异性抗原密度计算的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1739-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10223.x. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
5
Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.主动监测前列腺癌计划:约翰霍普金斯经验的更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2185-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8112. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
6
Epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer.前列腺癌不显著的 Epstein 标准。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(4):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.09979.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
7
Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原和即刻确认性活检在预测低危前列腺癌主动监测中进展的作用。
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.095. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
8
Critical assessment of preoperative urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 on the accuracy of prostate cancer staging.术前前列腺癌抗原 3 对前列腺癌分期准确性的批判性评估。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.024. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
9
Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌大样本主动监测队列长期随访的临床结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
10
Application of the Epstein criteria for prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer in Korean men.韩国男性中应用 Epstein 标准预测临床意义不显著前列腺癌的研究
BJU Int. 2010 Jun;105(11):1526-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09070.x. Epub 2009 Nov 13.