Sunohara M D, Gottschall N, Wilkes G, Craiovan E, Topp E, Que Z, Seidou O, Frey S K, Lapen D R
J Environ Qual. 2015 Sep;44(5):1589-604. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.01.0008.
Controlled tile drainage (CTD) regulates water and nutrient export from tile drainage systems. Observations of the effects of CTD imposed en masse at watershed scales are needed to determine the effect on downstream receptors. A paired-watershed approach was used to evaluate the effect of field-to-field CTD at the watershed scale on fluxes and flow-weighted mean concentrations (FWMCs) of N and P during multiple growing seasons. One watershed (467-ha catchment area) was under CTD management (treatment [CTD] watershed); the other (250-ha catchment area) had freely draining or uncontrolled tile drainage (UCTD) (reference [UCTD] watershed). The paired agricultural watersheds are located in eastern Ontario, Canada. Analysis of covariance and paired tests were used to assess daily fluxes and FWMCs during a calibration period when CTD intervention on the treatment watershed was minimal (2005-2006, when only 4-10% of the tile-drained area was under CTD) and a treatment period when the treatment (CTD) watershed had prolific CTD intervention (2007-2011 when 82% of tile drained fields were controlled, occupying >70% of catchment area). Significant linear regression slope changes assessed using ANCOVA ( ≤ 0.1) for daily fluxes from upstream and downstream monitoring sites pooled by calibration and treatment period were -0.06 and -0.20 (stream water) (negative values represent flux declines in CTD watershed), -0.59 and -0.77 (NH-N), -0.14 and -0.15 (NO-N), -1.77 and -2.10 (dissolved reactive P), and -0.28 and 0.45 (total P). Total P results for one site comparison contrasted with other findings likely due to unknown in-stream processes affecting total P loading, not efficacy of CTD. The FWMC results were mixed and inconclusive but suggest physical abatement by CTD is the means by which nutrient fluxes are predominantly reduced at these scales. Overall, our study results indicate that CTD is an effective practice for reducing watershed scale fluxes of stream water, N, and P during the growing season.
可控瓦管排水(CTD)可调节瓦管排水系统中的水分和养分输出。需要在流域尺度上对大规模实施的CTD效果进行观测,以确定其对下游受体的影响。采用配对流域方法,评估了流域尺度上田间CTD在多个生长季节对氮和磷通量及流量加权平均浓度(FWMCs)的影响。一个流域(集水面积467公顷)采用CTD管理(处理[CTD]流域);另一个(集水面积250公顷)采用自由排水或无控制瓦管排水(UCTD)(对照[UCTD]流域)。这两个配对的农业流域位于加拿大安大略省东部。在校准期(2005 - 2006年,当时只有4 - 10%的瓦管排水区域采用CTD),处理流域的CTD干预最小,以及处理期(2007 - 2011年,82%的瓦管排水田地得到控制,占集水面积的70%以上),采用协方差分析和配对检验来评估每日通量和FWMCs。在校准期和处理期汇总的上游和下游监测点,使用协方差分析(≤0.1)评估的每日通量显著线性回归斜率变化为:-0.06和-0.20(溪水)(负值表示CTD流域通量下降),-0.59和-0.77(NH - N),-0.14和-0.15(NO - N),-1.77和-2.10(溶解性活性磷),以及-0.28和0.45(总磷)。一个站点比较的总磷结果与其他研究结果不同,这可能是由于影响总磷负荷的未知河流水文过程,而非CTD的功效。FWMC结果好坏参半且无定论,但表明CTD的物理削减作用是这些尺度上养分通量减少的主要方式。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,CTD是减少生长季节流域尺度溪水、氮和磷通量的有效措施。