Moore R Andrew, Chi Ching-Chi, Wiffen Philip J, Derry Sheena, Rice Andrew S C
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD010902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010902.pub2.
Although often considered to be lacking adequate evidence, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the management of neuropathic pain. Previous surveys found 18% to 47% of affected people reported using NSAIDs specifically for their neuropathic pain, although possibly not in the United Kingdom (UK).
To assess the analgesic efficacy of oral NSAIDs for chronic neuropathic pain in adults, when compared to placebo or another active intervention, and the adverse events associated with its use in clinical trials.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to 29 May 2015, together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews, and an online trials registry.
We included randomised, double-blind studies of two weeks duration or longer, comparing any oral NSAID with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain.
Two review authors independently searched for studies, extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality. We did not carry out any pooled analysis.
We included two studies involving 251 participants with chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component or postherpetic neuralgia; 209 of these participants were involved in a study of an experimental NSAID not used in clinical practice, and of the remaining 42, only 16 had neuropathic pain. This represented only third tier evidence, and was of very low quality. There was no indication of any significant pain reduction with NSAIDs. Adverse event rates were low, with insufficient events for any analysis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to support or refute the use of oral NSAIDs to treat neuropathic pain conditions.
尽管非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)常被认为缺乏充分证据,但仍被广泛用于治疗神经性疼痛。以往的调查发现,18%至47%的患者报告专门使用NSAIDs来治疗神经性疼痛,不过在英国可能并非如此。
与安慰剂或其他活性干预措施相比,评估口服NSAIDs对成人慢性神经性疼痛的镇痛效果,以及在临床试验中使用NSAIDs相关的不良事件。
我们检索了截至2015年5月29日的Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE和EMBASE,同时检索了检索论文和综述的参考文献列表以及一个在线试验注册库。
我们纳入了为期两周或更长时间的随机、双盲研究,比较任何口服NSAIDs与安慰剂或其他活性治疗方法对慢性神经性疼痛的疗效。
两位综述作者独立检索研究、提取疗效和不良事件数据,并检查研究质量问题。我们未进行任何汇总分析。
我们纳入了两项研究,共251名患有神经性成分的慢性下腰痛或带状疱疹后神经痛的参与者;其中209名参与者参与了一项关于一种未用于临床实践的实验性NSAIDs的研究,在其余42名参与者中,只有16名患有神经性疼痛。这仅代表三级证据,且质量非常低。没有迹象表明NSAIDs能显著减轻疼痛。不良事件发生率较低,因事件数量不足无法进行任何分析。
没有证据支持或反驳使用口服NSAIDs治疗神经性疼痛。