• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[HIV感染患者中增强型蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗:真实环境下的一项研究结果]

[Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in HIV-infected patients: results of a study in a real life setting].

作者信息

Di Benedetto Nicolás, Montero-Alonso Marta, Blanes Marino, Lacruz José, Cuellar Sandra, Calabuig Eva, López José, Salavert Miguel

机构信息

Nicolás Di Benedetto, Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas. Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 106. 46026. Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Oct;28(5):235-41.

PMID:26437753
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy may offer antiviral efficacy while reducing drug interactions, costs and toxicity. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy in a real life setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all HIV infected patients, who had initiated DRV/r or LPV/r monotherapy, was performed. Patients whose HIV viral load had remained undetectable for at least two consecutive follow-up visits and who had no neurocognitive disorder or hepatitis B co-infection, were included.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included. The median (IQR) time to follow-up was 66 (33-118) weeks. The proportions (CI95%) of patients with virological failure were 6.3% (1.7- 20.2) and 25.0% (12.7-43.4), respectively, in the DRV/r and LPV/r groups (p= 0.0424). The proportions (CI95%) of patients with therapeutic success were 90.6% (80.5-100) in the DRV/r group and 60.7% (42.6-78.8) in the LPV/r group (p=0.0063). No protease inhibitor mutations were detected. During the follow-up, 6 patients with dyslipidemia normalized their lipid values. The median monthly cost was 410 (IQR 242-416) euros per person lower for the monotherapy than for the combined antiretroviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy was effective in a real life setting. This study showed differences in favour of DRV/r as compared with LPV/r in terms of therapeutic success; however prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. Finally, although this study was not specifically designed to detect benefits in terms of costs and lipid profile, it shows evidence of a positive impact of monotherapy in these fields.

摘要

背景

增强型蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗可能在提供抗病毒疗效的同时减少药物相互作用、成本和毒性。本研究的目的是评估在现实生活环境中达芦那韦/利托那韦(DRV/r)和洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)单药治疗的疗效。

方法

对所有开始接受DRV/r或LPV/r单药治疗的HIV感染患者进行回顾性分析。纳入那些HIV病毒载量在至少连续两次随访中一直未检测到且没有神经认知障碍或乙肝合并感染的患者。

结果

纳入60例患者。随访的中位(四分位间距)时间为66(33 - 118)周。DRV/r组和LPV/r组病毒学失败患者的比例(95%置信区间)分别为6.3%(1.7 - 20.2)和25.0%(12.7 - 43.4)(p = 0.0424)。DRV/r组治疗成功患者的比例(95%置信区间)为90.6%('80.5 - 100),LPV/r组为60.7%(42.6 - 78.8)(p = 0.0063)。未检测到蛋白酶抑制剂突变。随访期间,6例血脂异常患者的血脂值恢复正常。单药治疗的人均每月成本比联合抗逆转录病毒治疗低410(四分位间距242 - 416)欧元。

结论

增强型蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗在现实生活环境中是有效的。本研究显示,在治疗成功方面,与LPV/r相比,DRV/r更具优势;然而,需要前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。最后,尽管本研究并非专门设计用于检测成本和血脂方面的益处,但它显示了单药治疗在这些领域产生积极影响的证据。

相似文献

1
[Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in HIV-infected patients: results of a study in a real life setting].[HIV感染患者中增强型蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗:真实环境下的一项研究结果]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Oct;28(5):235-41.
2
[Darunavir/cobicistat monotherapy. Experience in a tertiary hospital].[达芦那韦/考比司他单药治疗。一家三级医院的经验]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2016 Dec;29(6):308-317. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Short Communication: Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Simplification to Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Darunavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.简短通讯:简化治疗为洛匹那韦/利托那韦或达芦那韦/利托那韦单药治疗的疗效与安全性:一项随机临床试验
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2016 May;32(5):452-5. doi: 10.1089/AID.2015.0248. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48.初治的HIV-1感染患者在第48周时,每日一次服用达芦那韦/利托那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦的疗效和安全性比较。
AIDS. 2008 Jul 31;22(12):1389-97. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830285fb.
5
Characterization of virologic failure patients on darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients.对治疗经验丰富的患者中接受达芦那韦/利托那韦治疗的病毒学失败患者的特征进行描述。
AIDS. 2009 Sep 10;23(14):1829-40. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832cbcec.
6
Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir vs. lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week analysis.初治的HIV-1感染患者中,每日一次达芦那韦/利托那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦的对比:96周分析。
AIDS. 2009 Aug 24;23(13):1679-88. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832d7350.
7
Identification of new genotypic cut-off levels to predict the efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir in the TITAN trial.鉴定新基因型界值以预测 TITAN 试验中洛匹那韦/利托那韦和达芦那韦/利托那韦的疗效。
HIV Med. 2009 Nov;10(10):620-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00734.x. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
8
Effectiveness of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in the clinical setting: same results as in clinical trials? The PIMOCS Study Group.临床环境中利托那韦增强型蛋白酶抑制剂单药治疗的有效性:与临床试验结果相同吗?PIMOCS研究组
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 May;69(5):1390-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt517. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
9
Refining criteria for selecting candidates for a safe lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy in HIV-infected virologically suppressed patients.优化在病毒学抑制的HIV感染患者中选择安全的洛匹那韦/利托那韦或达芦那韦/利托那韦单药治疗候选者的标准。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171611. eCollection 2017.
10
Final 192-week efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve patients in the ARTEMIS trial.ARTEMIS 试验中,初治 HIV-1 感染患者中每日一次达芦那韦/利托那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦相比的最终 192 周疗效和安全性。
HIV Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):49-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01060.x. Epub 2012 Oct 23.