Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药物新使用者:一项基于人群的队列研究,涉及抗精神病药物标签内及标签外处方实践相关的职业结局指标

New users of antipsychotic medication: A population-based cohort study of occupational outcome measures in relation to antipsychotic on-label and off-label prescribing practices.

作者信息

Baandrup L, Kruse M

机构信息

Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research & Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, Mental Health Center Glostrup, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark.

Center for Health Economics Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;31:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Oct 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment with antipsychotic medication is thoroughly investigated in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder but is also widely applied for a diversity of off-label conditions, despite an uncertain risk-benefit ratio. This study examined the relationship between antipsychotic prescribing patterns and labor market affiliation, considering both authority approved and off-label prescriptions and the relation to polypharmacy.

METHODS

Register-based cohort study using a dataset of 71,254 new antipsychotic users with a psychiatric diagnosis. Labor market affiliation and duration of welfare payments were analyzed using linear regression models and duration analysis. The analyses were adjusted for the following confounding variables: age, gender, diagnosis, marital status, length of education, and utilization of mental health care services.

RESULTS

The majority of new antipsychotic users received welfare payments for prolonged periods of time during the observation period, even more so for individuals treated with antipsychotic polypharmacy or other antipsychotic combination regimens. The risk of permanently leaving the labor market was also associated with antipsychotic combination regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic treatment, especially in combination with other antipsychotics or other psychotropic drugs, could serve as a marker of subjects with increased need for support to maintain the labor market affiliation. However, causality cannot be inferred from an observational study because of residual confounding that could not be adjusted for in this study.

摘要

背景

抗精神病药物治疗在精神分裂症和双相情感障碍中已得到充分研究,但尽管风险效益比不确定,它也被广泛应用于多种非适应证情况。本研究考察了抗精神病药物处方模式与劳动力市场归属之间的关系,同时考虑了权威机构批准的处方和非适应证处方以及与联合用药的关系。

方法

基于登记的队列研究,使用了一个包含71254名有精神科诊断的新抗精神病药物使用者的数据集。使用线性回归模型和生存分析来分析劳动力市场归属和福利支付持续时间。分析针对以下混杂变量进行了调整:年龄、性别、诊断、婚姻状况、教育年限以及精神卫生保健服务的使用情况。

结果

在观察期内,大多数新抗精神病药物使用者领取福利金的时间较长,接受抗精神病药物联合治疗或其他抗精神病药物联合治疗方案的个体更是如此。永久离开劳动力市场的风险也与抗精神病药物联合治疗方案有关。

结论

抗精神病药物治疗,尤其是与其他抗精神病药物或其他精神药物联合使用时,可能是那些需要更多支持以维持劳动力市场归属的人群的一个标志。然而,由于本研究中无法调整的残余混杂因素,不能从观察性研究中推断因果关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验