Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Hans Erik Johnsen, and Martin Bøgsted, Aalborg University Hospital; Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Hans Erik Johnsen, and Martin Bøgsted, Aalborg University, Aalborg; Martin Hutchings and Peter de Nully Brown, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen; Karen Juul Mylam, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Herman Nilsson-Ehle, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg; Elisabeth Székely and Mats Jerkeman, Lund University Hospital, Lund; and Viktoria Hjalmar, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):3993-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.0229. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Routine imaging for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission (CR) is controversial and plays a limited role in detecting relapse. This population-based study compared the survival of Danish and Swedish patients with DLBCL for whom traditions for routine imaging have been different.
Patients from the Danish and Swedish lymphoma registries were included according to the following criteria: newly diagnosed DLBCL from 2007 to 2012, age 18 to 65 years, and CR after R-CHOP/CHOEP. Follow-up for Swedish patients included symptom assessment, clinical examinations, and blood tests at 3- to 4-month intervals for 2 years, with longer intervals later in follow-up. Imaging was only recommended when relapse was clinically suspected. Follow-up for Danish patients was similar but included routine imaging (usually computed tomography every 6 months for 2 years).
Danish (n = 525) and Swedish (n = 696) patients with DLBCL had comparable baseline characteristics. Cumulative 2-year progression rate after CR was 6% (95% CI, 4 to 9) for International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≤ 2 versus 21% (95% CI, 13 to 28) for IPI > 2. Age > 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.8), B symptoms (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.0) were associated with worse post-CR survival. Imaging-based follow-up strategy had no impact on survival, neither for all patients nor for IPI-specific subgroups.
DLBCL relapse after first CR is infrequent, and the widespread use of routine imaging in Denmark did not translate into better survival. This favors follow-up without routine imaging and, more generally, a shift of focus from relapse detection to improved survivorship.
弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者在首次完全缓解(CR)后的常规影像学检查存在争议,且在检测复发方面作用有限。本项基于人群的研究比较了丹麦和瑞典的 DLBCL 患者的生存情况,这些患者的传统常规影像学检查存在差异。
根据以下标准纳入丹麦和瑞典淋巴瘤登记处的患者:2007 年至 2012 年新诊断的 DLBCL,年龄 18 至 65 岁,R-CHOP/CHOEP 后 CR。瑞典患者的随访包括症状评估、临床检查和血液检查,在 2 年内每 3 至 4 个月进行一次,在随访后期间隔时间更长。仅在临床怀疑复发时才推荐进行影像学检查。丹麦患者的随访情况类似,但包括常规影像学检查(通常在 2 年内每 6 个月进行一次计算机断层扫描)。
CR 后 2 年累积进展率在国际预后指数(IPI)≤2 的患者中为 6%(95%CI,4 至 9),而在 IPI>2 的患者中为 21%(95%CI,13 至 28)。年龄>60 岁(危险比[HR],2.3;95%CI,1.6 至 3.4)、乳酸脱氢酶升高(HR,2.3;95%CI,1.4 至 3.8)、B 症状(HR,1.7;95%CI,1.1 至 2.5)和东部肿瘤协作组体能状态≥2(HR,1.8;95%CI,1.0 至 3.0)与 CR 后生存较差相关。影像学随访策略对生存没有影响,无论是对所有患者还是对 IPI 特定亚组均无影响。
首次 CR 后 DLBCL 复发较为罕见,丹麦广泛使用常规影像学检查并未转化为更好的生存。这有利于不进行常规影像学检查随访,更广泛地将重点从检测复发转移到提高生存率。