• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔经腹外和经腹途径用于妇科癌症腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术:倾向调整分析

Single-Port Extra- and Transperitoneal Approach for Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancers: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

作者信息

Beytout Clémentine, Laas Enora, Naoura Iptissem, Bendifallah Sofiane, Canlorbe Geoffroy, Ballester Marcos, Daraï Emile

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, France.

Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):952-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4874-8. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4874-8
PMID:26438437
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy (PALN), an important step in the management of gynecologic cancers, is associated with low morbidity. However, some concerns exist about the completeness of PALN according to the route (transperitoneal vs. single-port extraperitoneal).

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone an endoscopic PALN for a gynecologic cancer from May 2010 to August 2014 at the authors' center. The findings showed that 44 patients had a single-port extraperitoneal PALN and 56 had a transperitoneal PALN. The factors independently related to technical performances were tested with a multivariate model adjusted for a propensity score.

RESULTS

A median of 16 lymph nodes were removed by the transperitoneal route and 12 by the extraperitoneal route (p = 0.04). No difference in the number of lymph nodes removed was observed after adjustment for the propensity score of patients who underwent the extraperitoneal approach (p = 0.9). The transperitoneal route was associated with more lymphocysts (20 vs. 2% for the extraperitoneal approach) (p = 0.008). The success rate for the extraperitoneal PALN was 91% (n = 40), with the three remaining patients requiring conversion to the transperitoneal route due to a peritoneal breach.

CONCLUSION

This propensity-score-adjusted study supports the conclusion that the efficacy of the single-port extraperitoneal route is similar to that of the transperitoneal route for PALN.

摘要

背景

内镜下腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术(PALN)是妇科癌症治疗中的重要步骤,其并发症发生率较低。然而,根据手术路径(经腹与单孔腹膜外),对于PALN的彻底性存在一些担忧。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了2010年5月至2014年8月在作者所在中心接受内镜下PALN治疗妇科癌症患者的记录。结果显示,44例患者接受了单孔腹膜外PALN,56例接受了经腹PALN。采用倾向评分调整的多变量模型对与技术操作独立相关的因素进行了检验。

结果

经腹途径切除的淋巴结中位数为16个,腹膜外途径为12个(p = 0.04)。在对接受腹膜外手术患者的倾向评分进行调整后,观察到切除淋巴结数量无差异(p = 0.9)。经腹途径与更多的淋巴囊肿相关(腹膜外途径为2%,经腹途径为20%)(p = 0.008)。腹膜外PALN的成功率为91%(n = 40),其余3例患者因腹膜破裂需要转为经腹途径。

结论

这项倾向评分调整研究支持以下结论,即单孔腹膜外途径在PALN方面的疗效与经腹途径相似。

相似文献

1
Single-Port Extra- and Transperitoneal Approach for Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancers: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.单孔经腹外和经腹途径用于妇科癌症腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术:倾向调整分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):952-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4874-8. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
2
[A propensity score evaluation of single-port or multiport extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy and the transperitoneal approach for gynecological cancers].[单孔或多孔腹膜外主动脉旁淋巴结切除术与经腹途径治疗妇科癌症的倾向评分评估]
Bull Cancer. 2016 Apr;103(4):320-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Surgical outcome of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymph node dissections compared with transperitoneal approach in gynecologic cancer patients.妇科恶性肿瘤患者腹膜外与经腹腔途径腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的外科治疗效果比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 May 14.
4
Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies.经腹与腹膜外腹腔镜下妇科恶性肿瘤腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
5
Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer.宫颈癌左侧腹膜外腹腔镜主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的技术发展与结果
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Apr;77(1):87-92. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5585.
6
Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.妇科肿瘤中心经腹淋巴结清扫术的引入:650例腹腔镜盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁经腹淋巴结清扫术分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.025.
7
Robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers: feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of isolated and combined procedures.妇科癌症的机器人腹膜外主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术:孤立手术和联合手术的可行性、安全性及短期疗效
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Oct;24(8):1486-92. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000240.
8
Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.比较腹膜外与经腹腔腹腔镜在早期卵巢和子宫内膜癌分期中外科并发症。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.038. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in gynaecological neoplasms: comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal lymphadenectomy.妇科肿瘤的机器人腹膜后淋巴结清扫术:腹膜外与经腹淋巴结切除术的比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):11-28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3814-y. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
10
Role of different approaches to the abdominal retroperitoneum for aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancers.不同入路在妇科恶性肿瘤腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术中的作用。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;39(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.07.114. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Extraperitoneal Approach for Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: A Technique Note and Feasibility Study.经脐腹腔镜单孔腹膜外途径行盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术:技术要点与可行性研究
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 15;9:863078. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.863078. eCollection 2022.
2
Surgical Outcomes of Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Compared With Extraperitoneal Approach in Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术与经腹膜外途径治疗妇科癌症的手术结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2021 Dec 21;8:779372. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.779372. eCollection 2021.