Engels Kimberly S
Marquette University, 2434 North 68th Street, Wauwatosa, WI, 53213, USA.
J Med Humanit. 2016 Sep;37(3):299-312. doi: 10.1007/s10912-015-9361-5.
This article utilizes the Foucauldian concepts of biopower and normalization to give an analysis of the debate surrounding the controversial administration of the HPV vaccine to adolescents. My intention is not to solve the problem, rather to utilize a Foucauldian framework to bring various facets of the issue to light, specifically the way the vaccine contributes to strategies of power in reference to how young adults develop within relationships of power. To begin, the article provides an overview of the Foucauldian concepts of biopower and normalization, including how these two strategies of power were present in the administration of the smallpox vaccine in the 19th century. Next, information about HPV and the history of the current controversy in the United States is presented. Lastly, the article presents an analysis of the strategies of biopower and normalization present in the debate on HPV, including an emphasis on how the vaccination is similar to, and different from, 19th century smallpox vaccination. It also explores the way that mechanisms of disease control affect and are affected by individual subjects, in this case, adolescents.
本文运用福柯的生命权力和规范化概念,对围绕向青少年接种人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗这一争议性管理措施的辩论进行分析。我的目的并非解决问题,而是运用福柯的框架来揭示该问题的各个方面,特别是疫苗在年轻人于权力关系中成长方面如何促成权力策略。首先,本文概述了福柯的生命权力和规范化概念,包括这两种权力策略在19世纪天花疫苗接种管理中的体现。接下来,介绍了有关HPV的信息以及美国当前争议的历史。最后,本文对HPV辩论中存在的生命权力和规范化策略进行分析,包括强调该疫苗接种与19世纪天花疫苗接种的异同。它还探讨了疾病控制机制如何影响个体(在这种情况下是青少年)以及如何受到个体的影响。