Goldhawk C, Janzen E, González L A, Crowe T, Kastelic J, Kehler C, Siemens M, Ominski K, Pajor E, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K S
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jul;93(7):3639-53. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8390.
The current study evaluated 17 loads of cull beef cows transported in Canadian winter conditions to assess in-transit temperature and humidity, evaluation of events during loading and unloading, and animal condition and bruising. Regardless of the use of boards to block ventilation holes in trailers, temperatures were higher within trailers than at ambient locations during both travel and stationary periods (P < 0.01). Boarding was associated with smaller differences in trailer temperature, compared with ambient conditions, while the trailer was traveling at highway speeds versus when trailers were stationary (P < 0.01). Moisture levels within trailers were not different from ambient conditions when loads using boarding were traveling (P < 0.01), whereas loads without boarding had a larger difference (P < 0.01). The moisture within trailers relative to ambient conditions increased when trailers were stationary compared with traveling when boarding was used (P < 0.01). The majority of cattle transported were in good body condition (97.4% within BCS of 2 to 3.5) and had calm temperaments (96.7%). Although all comparisons were made, only the doghouse compartment had an increased risk of severe bruising compared with all other compartments (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.0 [1.6–5.5], 3.7 [2.1–6.4], 2.2 [1.3–3.7] and 3.8 [1.5–9.6] in comparison with the back, belly, deck, and nose compartments, respectively; P < 0.05). Increasing the duration of waiting to unload 30 min relative to a 1 h duration increased the odds of severe bruising by 1.18 times (95% confidence interval: 1.09–1.29; P < 0.01). Scoring systems that have been developed for auditing unloading of cattle had limited variation across loads at both loading and unloading. Pretransport assessment of animal condition using the American Meat Institute’s compromised animal score was the only scoring system that was consistent with posttransport scores. We inferred from the temperature and humidity data in the current study that under commercial conditions, boarding may increase ventilation within trailers during travel and decrease ventilation during stationary periods. The current study provides the first indication that issues in Canadian cull cow transport may be related to pretransport animal condition and management of unloading.
本研究评估了17批在加拿大冬季条件下运输的淘汰肉牛,以评估运输过程中的温度和湿度、装卸过程中的事件以及动物状况和瘀伤情况。无论是否使用木板堵塞拖车通风孔,在运输和静止期间,拖车内的温度均高于环境温度(P<0.01)。与环境条件相比,使用木板时,拖车在高速公路行驶时温度差异比静止时小(P<0.01)。使用木板装载的货物在运输时,拖车内的湿度与环境条件无差异(P<0.01),而未使用木板的货物湿度差异更大(P<0.01)。与运输时相比,使用木板且拖车静止时,拖车内相对于环境条件的湿度增加(P<0.01)。运输的大多数牛身体状况良好(97.4%的体况评分在2至3.5之间)且性情温顺(96.7%)。尽管进行了所有比较,但只有狗屋隔层与所有其他隔层相比,严重瘀伤风险增加(优势比[95%置信区间]:与后部、腹部、甲板和鼻部隔层相比分别为3.0[1.6 - 5.5]、3.7[2.1 - 6.4]、2.2[1.3 - 3.7]和3.8[1.5 - 9.6];P<0.05)。与等待1小时卸载相比,等待30分钟卸载时间增加,严重瘀伤的几率增加1.18倍(95%置信区间:1.09 - 1.29;P<0.01)。已开发的用于审核牛卸载情况的评分系统在装卸时不同批次货物间变化有限。使用美国肉类协会的受损动物评分对动物状况进行运输前评估是唯一与运输后评分一致的评分系统。我们从本研究的温度和湿度数据推断,在商业条件下,使用木板可能会增加运输时拖车内的通风,减少静止时的通风。本研究首次表明,加拿大淘汰母牛运输中的问题可能与运输前动物状况和卸载管理有关。