Taylor Samuel A, Newman Ashley M, Nguyen Joseph, Fabricant Peter D, Baret Nikolas J, Shorey Mary, Ramkumar Prem, O'Brien Stephen J
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A..
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2016 Feb;32(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for biceps-labrum complex (BLC) lesions, including the extra-articular bicipital tunnel.
A retrospective review of 277 shoulders with chronic refractory BLC symptoms that underwent arthroscopic subdeltoid transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) to the conjoint tendon was conducted. Intraoperative lesions were categorized as "inside" (labral tears and dynamic LHBT incarceration), "junctional" (LHBT partial tears, LHBT subluxation, and biceps chondromalacia), or "bicipital tunnel" (extra-articular bicipital tunnel scar/stenosis, loose bodies, LHBT instability, and LHBT partial tears) based on anatomic location. Attending radiologist-generated MRI reports were graded dichotomously as positive or negative for biceps and labral damage and then compared with intraoperative findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for MRI with respect to intraoperative findings.
With regard to inside lesions, MRI had an overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for labrum lesions of 77.3%, 68.2%, 57.3%, and 84.5% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI for junctional lesions were 43.3%, 55.6%, 73.1%, and 26.0%, respectively. For the bicipital tunnel, MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 50.4%, 61.4%, 48.7%, and 63.0%, respectively.
MRI was unreliable for ruling out BLC lesions among chronically symptomatic patients, including when the bicipital tunnel was affected.
确定磁共振成像(MRI)对肱二头肌-盂唇复合体(BLC)损伤的诊断准确性,包括关节外肱二头肌隧道。
对277例患有慢性难治性BLC症状且接受了肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)经关节镜下转移至联合肌腱的肩部病例进行回顾性研究。术中损伤根据解剖位置分为“内部”(盂唇撕裂和动态LHBT嵌顿)、“交界区”(LHBT部分撕裂、LHBT半脱位和肱二头肌软骨软化)或“肱二头肌隧道”(关节外肱二头肌隧道瘢痕/狭窄、游离体、LHBT不稳定和LHBT部分撕裂)。由主治放射科医生生成的MRI报告针对肱二头肌和盂唇损伤分为阳性或阴性,然后与术中发现进行比较。计算MRI相对于术中发现的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
对于内部损伤,MRI对盂唇损伤的总体敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为77.3%、68.2%、57.3%和84.5%。MRI对交界区损伤的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为43.3%、55.6%、73.1%和26.0%。对于肱二头肌隧道,MRI的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为50.4%、61.4%、48.7%和63.0%。
MRI在排除慢性症状患者的BLC损伤方面不可靠,包括肱二头肌隧道受影响时。