McNeeley Susan, Wilcox Pamela
Department of Criminal Justice, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, USA.
Violence Vict. 2015;30(6):1049-67. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00014. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Previous research has shown that individuals who adopt values in line with the code of the street are more likely to experience violent victimization (e.g., Stewart, Schreck, & Simons, 2006). This study extends this literature by examining the relationship between the street code and multiple types of violent and property victimization. This research investigates the relationship between street code-related values and 4 types of victimization (assault, breaking and entering, theft, and vandalism) using Poisson-based multilevel regression models. Belief in the street code was associated with higher risk of experiencing assault, breaking and entering, and vandalism, whereas theft victimization was not related to the street code. The results suggest that the code of the street influences victimization broadly--beyond violence--by increasing behavior that provokes retaliation from others in various forms.
先前的研究表明,认同街头法则的个体更有可能遭受暴力侵害(例如,斯图尔特、施雷克和西蒙斯,2006年)。本研究通过考察街头法则与多种暴力及财产侵害类型之间的关系,对这一文献进行了拓展。本研究使用基于泊松的多层次回归模型,调查了与街头法则相关的价值观与4种侵害类型(袭击、破门而入、盗窃和故意破坏)之间的关系。对街头法则的信奉与遭受袭击、破门而入和故意破坏的较高风险相关,而盗窃侵害与街头法则无关。结果表明,街头法则通过增加引发他人各种形式报复的行为,广泛地影响侵害行为——超出了暴力范畴。