Suppr超能文献

群体中的认知协同以及决策能力从群体到个体的转移。

Cognitive synergy in groups and group-to-individual transfer of decision-making competencies.

作者信息

Curşeu Petru L, Meslec Nicoleta, Pluut Helen, Lucas Gerardus J M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, "Babeş-Bolyai" University Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 22;6:1375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01375. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

In a field study (148 participants organized in 38 groups) we tested the effect of group synergy and one's position in relation to the collaborative zone of proximal development (CZPD) on the change of individual decision-making competencies. We used two parallel sets of decision tasks reported in previous research to test rationality and we evaluated individual decision-making competencies in the pre-group and post-group conditions as well as group rationality (as an emergent group level phenomenon). We used multilevel modeling to analyze the data and the results showed that members of synergetic groups had a higher cognitive gain as compared to members of non-synergetic groups, while highly rational members (members above the CZPD) had lower cognitive gains compared to less rational group members (members situated below the CZPD). These insights extend the literature on group-to-individual transfer of learning and have important practical implications as they show that group dynamics influence the development of individual decision-making competencies.

摘要

在一项实地研究中(148名参与者分成38个小组),我们测试了群体协同效应以及个体相对于合作性近端发展区(CZPD)的位置对个体决策能力变化的影响。我们使用了先前研究中报告的两组平行决策任务来测试理性,并在分组前和分组后条件下评估个体决策能力以及群体理性(作为一种涌现的群体层面现象)。我们使用多层模型分析数据,结果表明,与非协同小组的成员相比,协同小组的成员有更高的认知收获,而高度理性的成员(CZPD以上的成员)与理性程度较低的小组成员(位于CZPD以下的成员)相比,认知收获较低。这些见解扩展了关于从群体到个体的学习迁移的文献,并且具有重要的实际意义,因为它们表明群体动态会影响个体决策能力的发展。

相似文献

1
Cognitive synergy in groups and group-to-individual transfer of decision-making competencies.
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 22;6:1375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01375. eCollection 2015.
2
Decision rules and group rationality: cognitive gain or standstill?
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056454. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
3
When none of us perform better than all of us together: the role of analogical decision rules in groups.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e85232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085232. eCollection 2014.
4
Individually irrational pruning is essential for ecological rationality in a social context.
Cogn Psychol. 2020 May;118:101272. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101272. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Reasoning, decision making and rationality.
Cognition. 1993 Oct-Nov;49(1-2):165-87. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90039-x.
6
The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality.
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1145246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145246. eCollection 2023.
7
Intergroup conflict and rational decision making.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e114013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114013. eCollection 2014.
8
Cognitive distance, absorptive capacity and group rationality: a simulation study.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e109359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109359. eCollection 2014.
10
Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy.
Am J Bioeth. 2016 May;16(5):5-15. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1159750.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the dynamics of team cognition in emergency response teams.
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1534224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534224. eCollection 2025.
2
Role of leaders' positive mindset in mitigating the effects of crises on organizations: The case of Canadian organizations.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 21;20(3):e0319931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319931. eCollection 2025.
3
Multiple Team Membership, Performance, and Confidence in Estimation Tasks.
Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:658827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658827. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Option generation in decision making: ideation beyond memory retrieval.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01584. eCollection 2014.
2
Cognitive distance, absorptive capacity and group rationality: a simulation study.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e109359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109359. eCollection 2014.
3
The magic of collective emotional intelligence in learning groups: No guys needed for the spell!
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):217-34. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12075. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
4
When none of us perform better than all of us together: the role of analogical decision rules in groups.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e85232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085232. eCollection 2014.
5
Decision rules and group rationality: cognitive gain or standstill?
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056454. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
6
The point of normative models in judgment and decision making.
Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 24;3:577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00577. eCollection 2012.
7
Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups.
Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):686-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1193147. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
8
Prioritizing environmental health risks in the UAE.
Risk Anal. 2010 Dec;30(12):1842-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01463.x. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
9
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):938-956. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938.
10
Rationality.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:491-517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135213.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验