• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟西汀与氯米帕明治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效与安全性双盲对照研究

Double-blind controlled study on the clinical efficacy and safety of fluoxetine vs clomipramine in the treatment of major depressive disorders.

作者信息

Manna V, Martucci N, Agnoli A

机构信息

Italian Institute of Neurotraumatology, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989 Jan;4 Suppl 1:81-8.

PMID:2644342
Abstract

In the present double-blind controlled study the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine 20 mg/day versus clomipramine 75 mg/day was evaluated during 5 weeks of treatment in 30 hospitalized patients. The sample was selected according to DSM III criteria for major depressive disorders with a score of at least 18 on the first 17 items of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated weekly by using HRSD, Zung Self Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-Asberg Scale for Depression, Clinical Global Impression for severity and improvement of depressive symptoms. Safety was monitored weekly by recording body weight, blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature, physical conditions, laboratory tests, adverse experiences and concomitant medication. The results confirm the effectiveness and good tolerability of fluoxetine in the treatment of depressive disorders.

摘要

在本双盲对照研究中,对30例住院患者进行了为期5周的治疗,评估了每日20毫克氟西汀与每日75毫克氯米帕明的疗效和安全性。样本根据精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版(DSM III)中重度抑郁症的标准选取,汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD)前17项得分至少为18分。每周使用HRSD、zung抑郁自评量表、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表、临床总体印象量表评估抑郁症状的严重程度和改善情况,以此来评价治疗效果。通过记录体重、血压、脉搏率、体温、身体状况、实验室检查、不良反应和伴随用药情况,每周监测安全性。结果证实了氟西汀治疗抑郁症的有效性和良好耐受性。

相似文献

1
Double-blind controlled study on the clinical efficacy and safety of fluoxetine vs clomipramine in the treatment of major depressive disorders.氟西汀与氯米帕明治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效与安全性双盲对照研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989 Jan;4 Suppl 1:81-8.
2
[Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus clomipramine in ambulatory patients with a depressive syndrome in a clinical trial with private practitioners].[在一项与私人执业医生合作开展的临床试验中,氟西汀与氯米帕明治疗门诊抑郁综合征患者的疗效与安全性比较]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1991;103(6):176-82.
3
[Double-blind study of mianserin and fluoxetine in ambulatory therapy of depressed patients].[米安色林与氟西汀对门诊抑郁症患者治疗的双盲研究]
Encephale. 1993 Jul-Aug;19(4):341-5.
4
[Paroxetine in the treatment of depression in geriatric patients--a double-blind comparative study with fluoxetine].[帕罗西汀治疗老年患者抑郁症——与氟西汀的双盲对照研究]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1994 Sep;62 Suppl 1:16-8.
5
A randomized, double-blind study of fluoxetine and maprotiline in the treatment of major depression.
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1991 Mar;24(2):62-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014440.
6
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
7
Fluoxetine versus clomipramine in major depressive disorders.氟西汀与氯米帕明治疗重度抑郁症的对比
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989 Jan;4 Suppl 1:89-95.
8
Comparison of efficacy and safety of milnacipran and fluoxetine in Korean patients with major depression.米那普明与氟西汀治疗韩国重度抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1369-75. doi: 10.1185/030079905X59166.
9
Fluoxetine in endogenous depression and melancholia versus clomipramine.氟西汀治疗内源性抑郁症和忧郁症与氯米帕明的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989 Jan;4 Suppl 1:37-40.
10
Eszopiclone co-administered with fluoxetine in patients with insomnia coexisting with major depressive disorder.在伴有重度抑郁症的失眠患者中,艾司佐匹克隆与氟西汀联合用药。
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型的抑郁症药物治疗对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3.
2
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型抗抑郁药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub2.
3
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:疗效与可接受性的荟萃分析
BMJ. 1993 Mar 13;306(6879):683-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6879.683.
4
Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.与三环类抗抑郁药相比,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的治疗中断情况:一项荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1995 Jun 3;310(6992):1433-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6992.1433.