• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Onstep与Lichtenstein技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术后的短期结局:一项随机临床试验的结果

Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Andresen K, Burcharth J, Fonnes S, Hupfeld L, Rothman J P, Deigaard S, Winther D, Errebo M B, Therkildsen R, Hauge D, Sørensen F S, Bjerg J, Rosenberg J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Center for Perioperative Optimization, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev,, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Surgery, Horsens Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.

出版信息

Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8
PMID:26445862
Abstract

PURPOSE

Because of the high number of patients with chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair, a new, simple and safe method of repair is needed. Onstep is a new type of inguinal hernia repair that might be able to reduce postoperative acute and chronic pain. The aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences in early postoperative pain during the first 10 days between the Onstep and the Lichtenstein technique.

METHODS

This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in five surgical departments in Denmark, from April 2013 to June 2014. Eligible participants for this study were male patients, >18 years, with a primary inguinal hernia. Experimental treatment in this study was the Onstep technique, which was compared with the Lichtenstein repair. Primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first 10 days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, period for return to normal daily activities (days), and recurrence. Randomization was done in blocks and stratified on centers. Participants and study personnel handling questionnaires and analysis were blinded to the allocation.

RESULTS

In total, 290 participants were randomized. We found no significant differences between the groups regarding early postoperative pain or minor postoperative complications. Four patients had a recurrence within the first 10 days of follow-up, one patient in the Lichtenstein group and three patients in the Onstep group, p = 0.30.

CONCLUSION

The Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair was safe and had comparable results to the Lichtenstein repair regarding short-term pain and postoperative complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01753219).

摘要

目的

由于腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛患者数量众多,需要一种新的、简单且安全的修补方法。Onstep是一种新型的腹股沟疝修补术,可能能够减少术后急性和慢性疼痛。本研究的目的是调查Onstep技术与Lichtenstein技术在术后前10天的早期术后疼痛方面是否存在差异。

方法

这是一项双盲、随机临床试验,于2013年4月至2014年6月在丹麦的五个外科科室进行。本研究的合格参与者为年龄大于18岁的原发性腹股沟疝男性患者。本研究中的实验性治疗是Onstep技术,并与Lichtenstein修补术进行比较。主要结局是术后第10天内的术后疼痛。次要结局包括手术持续时间、恢复正常日常活动的时间(天)和复发情况。随机分组采用区组设计并按中心分层。处理问卷和分析的参与者及研究人员对分组情况不知情。

结果

总共290名参与者被随机分组。我们发现两组在早期术后疼痛或轻微术后并发症方面没有显著差异。在随访的前10天内有4例患者复发,Lichtenstein组1例,Onstep组3例,p = 0.30。

结论

Onstep腹股沟疝修补技术是安全的,在短期疼痛和术后并发症方面与Lichtenstein修补术效果相当。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT01753219)。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcome after Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: results from a randomized clinical trial.Onstep与Lichtenstein技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术后的短期结局:一项随机临床试验的结果
Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1428-8. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
2
Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair with the ONSTEP versus the Lichtenstein technique, results of a double-blinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.使用ONSTEP与Lichtenstein技术进行腹股沟疝修补术后的慢性疼痛,一项双盲多中心随机临床试验的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Mar;402(2):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1532-y. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
3
Onstep repair of inguinal hernias.腹股沟疝的原位修补术。
Dan Med J. 2018 Mar;65(3).
4
Sexual dysfunction after inguinal hernia repair with the Onstep versus Lichtenstein technique: A randomized clinical trial.使用Onstep与Lichtenstein技术进行腹股沟疝修补术后的性功能障碍:一项随机临床试验。
Surgery. 2017 Jun;161(6):1690-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Lichtenstein versus Onstep for inguinal hernia repair: protocol for a double-blinded randomised trial.利希滕斯坦术与昂斯特普术治疗腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项双盲随机试验方案
Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):A4729.
6
Open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) versus Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernias.开放式新式完全腹膜外(ONSTEP)疝修补术与平片无张力修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Sep;103(8):569-575. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7105.
7
Postoperative inguinal pain and disability after Lichtenstein versus ONSTEP hernia repair: analysis of responses to the inguinal pain questionnaire in Spanish.Lichtenstein 与 ONSTEP 疝修补术后腹股沟疼痛和残疾:对西班牙语版腹股沟疼痛问卷的应答分析。
Surg Today. 2021 May;51(5):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02155-8. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
8
The initial experience of introducing the Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair in a general surgical department.普通外科引入Onstep技术进行腹股沟疝修补术的初步经验。
Scand J Surg. 2015 Jun;104(2):61-5. doi: 10.1177/1457496914529930. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
9
The ONSTEP inguinal hernia repair technique: initial clinical experience of 693 patients, in two institutions.ONSTEP 腹股沟疝修补技术:两家机构 693 例患者的初步临床经验。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1057-z. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
10
Health status one year after TransInguinal PrePeritoneal inguinal hernia repair and Lichtenstein's method: an analysis alongside a randomized clinical study.经 TransInguinal PrePeritoneal 腹股沟疝修补术和 Lichtenstein 法治疗 1 年后的健康状况:一项随机临床试验分析。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0963-9. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.不同的腹股沟疝修补术后恢复期建议:系统范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1009-1021. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
2
Open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) versus Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernias.开放式新式完全腹膜外(ONSTEP)疝修补术与平片无张力修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Sep;103(8):569-575. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7105.
3
Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair with the ONSTEP versus the Lichtenstein technique, results of a double-blinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Team Training (Training at Own Facility) versus Individual Surgeon's Training (Training at Trainer's Facility) When Implementing a New Surgical Technique: Example from the ONSTEP Inguinal Hernia Repair.
Surg Res Pract. 2014;2014:762761. doi: 10.1155/2014/762761. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
2
The initial experience of introducing the Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair in a general surgical department.普通外科引入Onstep技术进行腹股沟疝修补术的初步经验。
Scand J Surg. 2015 Jun;104(2):61-5. doi: 10.1177/1457496914529930. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
3
Lichtenstein versus Onstep for inguinal hernia repair: protocol for a double-blinded randomised trial.利希滕斯坦术与昂斯特普术治疗腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项双盲随机试验方案
使用ONSTEP与Lichtenstein技术进行腹股沟疝修补术后的慢性疼痛,一项双盲多中心随机临床试验的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Mar;402(2):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1532-y. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Recurrence mechanisms after inguinal hernia repair by the Onstep technique: a case series.Onstep技术腹股沟疝修补术后的复发机制:病例系列
Hernia. 2016 Oct;20(5):681-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1496-4. Epub 2016 May 4.
Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):A4729.
4
The ONSTEP inguinal hernia repair technique: initial clinical experience of 693 patients, in two institutions.ONSTEP 腹股沟疝修补技术:两家机构 693 例患者的初步临床经验。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1057-z. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
5
Comparative study between Lichtenstein procedure and modified darn repair in treating primary inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Lichtenstein 手术与改良式 darn 修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的对比研究:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1039-6. Epub 2013 Jan 6.
6
Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair.随机对照临床试验:自固定补片与缝合补片在李金斯坦疝修补术中的应用比较。
Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):474-81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9006. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
7
Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein's method for inguinal hernia repair.经 Transinguinal 腹膜前技术与 Lichtenstein 法治疗腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的随机临床试验比较。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8862.
8
Does nerve identification during open inguinal herniorrhaphy reduce the risk of nerve damage and persistent pain?在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中进行神经识别是否会降低神经损伤和持续性疼痛的风险?
Hernia. 2012 Oct;16(5):573-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0946-x. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
9
Lichtenstein, prolene hernia system, and UltraPro Hernia System for primary inguinal hernia repair: one-year outcome of a prospective randomized controlled trial.Lichtenstein、 prolene 疝修补系统和 UltraPro 疝修补系统治疗原发性腹股沟疝修补术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的一年结果。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):277-85. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0903-8. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
10
Determinants of a short convalescence after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后短期康复的决定因素。
Surgery. 2012 Apr;151(4):556-63. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Oct 19.