• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学标准系统命名法 - 临床术语中青光眼检查概念表示的差距分析

Gap Analysis of Glaucoma Examination Concept Representations within Standard Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms.

作者信息

Hallaj Shahin, Khawaja Anthony P, Rodrigues Ian A S, Boland Michael V, Brown Eric N, Chen Aiyin, Stagg Brian C, Stein Joshua D, Sun Catherine Q, Mahe-Cook Anne-Laure, Swaminathan Swarup S, Wang Sophia Y, Xu Benjamin Y, Weinreb Robert N, Baxter Sally L

机构信息

Division of Ophthalmology Informatics and Data Science, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.

National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025 Jan-Feb;8(1):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.08.001
PMID:39147325
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11781150/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE/PURPOSE: Standardization of eye care data is important for clinical interoperability and research. We aimed to address gaps in the representations of glaucoma examination concepts within Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT), the preferred terminology of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

DESIGN

Study of data elements.

METHODS

Structured eye examination data fields from 2 electronic health records (EHR) systems (Epic Systems and Medisoft) were compared against existing SNOMED-CT codes for concepts representing glaucoma examination findings. Glaucoma specialists from multiple institutions were surveyed to identify high-priority gaps in representation, which were discussed among the SNOMED International Eye Care Clinical Reference Group. Proposals for new codes to address the gaps were formulated and submitted for inclusion in SNOMED-CT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Gaps in SNOMED-CT glaucoma examination concept representations.

RESULTS

We identified several gaps in SNOMED-CT regarding glaucoma examination concepts. A survey of glaucoma specialists identified high-priority data elements within the categories of tonometry and gonioscopy. For tonometry, there was consensus that we need to define new codes related to maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) and target IOP and delineate all methods of measuring IOP. These new codes were proposed and successfully added to SNOMED-CT for future use. Regarding gonioscopy, the current terminology did not include the ability to denote the gonioscopic grading system used (e.g., Shaffer or Spaeth), degree of angle pigmentation, iris configuration (except for plateau iris), and iris approach. There was also no ability to specify eye laterality or angle quadrant for gonioscopic findings. We proposed a framework for representing gonioscopic findings as observable entities in SNOMED-CT.

CONCLUSION

There are existing gaps in the standardized representation of findings related to tonometry and gonioscopy within SNOMED-CT. These are important areas for evaluating clinical outcomes and enabling secondary use of EHR data for glaucoma research. This international multi-institutional collaborative process enabled identification of gaps, prioritization, and development of data standards to address these gaps. Addressing these gaps and augmenting SNOMED-CT coverage of glaucoma examination findings could enhance clinical documentation and future research efforts related to glaucoma.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

摘要

目的

眼科护理数据的标准化对于临床互操作性和研究至关重要。我们旨在解决医学系统化命名法 - 临床术语(SNOMED-CT)(美国眼科学会的首选术语)中青光眼检查概念表示方面的差距。

设计

数据元素研究。

方法

将来自两个电子健康记录(EHR)系统(Epic Systems和Medisoft)的结构化眼科检查数据字段与代表青光眼检查结果的现有SNOMED-CT代码进行比较。对多个机构的青光眼专家进行了调查,以确定表示方面的高优先级差距,这些差距在SNOMED国际眼科护理临床参考小组中进行了讨论。制定了填补差距的新代码提案并提交以纳入SNOMED-CT。

主要观察指标

SNOMED-CT青光眼检查概念表示中的差距。

结果

我们在SNOMED-CT中发现了一些关于青光眼检查概念的差距。对青光眼专家的一项调查确定了眼压测量和前房角镜检查类别中的高优先级数据元素。对于眼压测量,大家一致认为我们需要定义与最大眼内压(IOP)和目标眼压相关的新代码,并描述所有测量眼压的方法。这些新代码已被提出并成功添加到SNOMED-CT中以供将来使用。关于前房角镜检查,当前术语不包括表示所使用的前房角镜分级系统(例如,Shaffer或Spaeth)、房角色素沉着程度、虹膜形态(除了高褶虹膜)和虹膜入路的能力。也无法为前房角镜检查结果指定眼别或房角象限。我们提出了一个在SNOMED-CT中将前房角镜检查结果表示为可观察实体的框架。

结论

SNOMED-CT中与眼压测量和前房角镜检查相关的结果标准化表示存在现有差距。这些是评估临床结果以及使EHR数据能够用于青光眼研究二次利用的重要领域。这个国际多机构协作过程能够识别差距、确定优先级并制定数据标准来填补这些差距。填补这些差距并扩大SNOMED-CT对青光眼检查结果的覆盖范围可以加强与青光眼相关的临床记录和未来研究工作。

财务披露

在本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会找到专有或商业披露信息。

相似文献

1
Gap Analysis of Glaucoma Examination Concept Representations within Standard Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms.医学标准系统命名法 - 临床术语中青光眼检查概念表示的差距分析
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025 Jan-Feb;8(1):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Use of SNOMED CT® and LOINC® to standardize terminology for primary care asthma electronic health records.使用SNOMED CT®和LOINC®对基层医疗哮喘电子健康记录的术语进行标准化。
J Asthma. 2018 Jun;55(6):629-639. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1362424. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
3
Content analysis of physical examination templates in electronic health records using SNOMED CT.使用SNOMED CT对电子健康记录中的体格检查模板进行内容分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Oct;83(10):736-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
4
Nursing interventions classification in systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms: a cross-mapping validation.医学临床术语系统命名法中的护理干预分类:交叉映射验证
Comput Inform Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):198-208; quiz 209-10. doi: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000280590.35690.7d.
5
SNOMED CT Concept Hierarchies for Sharing Definitions of Clinical Conditions Using Electronic Health Record Data.使用电子健康记录数据共享临床病症定义的SNOMED CT概念层次结构。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):667-682. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668090. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terminology (SNOMED CT) Clinical Use Cases in the Context of Electronic Health Record Systems: Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录系统背景下的医学临床术语系统命名法(SNOMED CT)临床用例:系统文献综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Feb 6;11:e43750. doi: 10.2196/43750.
7
Evaluating the representation of disaster hazards in SNOMED CT: gaps and opportunities.评估 SNOMED CT 中灾害风险的表示:差距与机遇。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Oct 19;30(11):1762-1772. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad153.
8
Evaluating standard terminologies for encoding allergy information.评估用于编码过敏信息的标准术语。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):969-79. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000816. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
9
Rigor in electronic health record knowledge representation: Lessons learned from a SNOMED CT clinical content encoding exercise.电子健康记录知识表示中的严谨性:从SNOMED CT临床内容编码实践中汲取的经验教训。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(2):97-111. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2014.965302. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
10
Concept Coverage Analysis of Ophthalmic Infections and Trauma among the Standardized Medical Terminologies SNOMED-CT, ICD-10-CM, and ICD-11.标准化医学术语SNOMED-CT、ICD-10-CM和ICD-11中眼科感染与创伤的概念覆盖分析
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 May 25;3(4):100337. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100337. eCollection 2023 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Ahmed and baerveldt in glaucoma surgery: what is the safest choice? - a systematic review and meta-analysis.青光眼手术中的艾哈迈德和贝尔费尔德:最安全的选择是什么?——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06794-w.
2
Outcomes of Glaucoma Referrals in Adults Aged 18 to 40 Years.18至40岁成年人青光眼转诊的结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2457843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57843.
3
Federated Learning in Glaucoma: A Comprehensive Review and Future Perspectives.青光眼领域的联邦学习:全面综述与未来展望

本文引用的文献

1
Advancing Toward a Common Data Model in Ophthalmology: Gap Analysis of General Eye Examination Concepts to Standard Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Concepts.迈向眼科通用数据模型:普通眼科检查概念与标准观察性医学结局合作组织(OMOP)概念的差距分析
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Aug 25;3(4):100391. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100391. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Challenges and Opportunities for Secondary Use of Observational Data Following an EHR Transition.电子健康记录转换后观察性数据二次利用的挑战与机遇
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):943-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08330-0.
3
Pigment dispersion syndrome: A brief overview.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025 Jan-Feb;8(1):92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
色素播散综合征:简要概述。
J Clin Transl Res. 2022 Sep 7;8(5):344-350. eCollection 2022 Oct 31.
4
Towards effective data sharing in ophthalmology: data standardization and data privacy.迈向眼科领域的数据有效共享:数据标准化和数据隐私保护。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 1;33(5):418-424. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000878. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Harmonizing units and values of quantitative data elements in a very large nationally pooled electronic health record (EHR) dataset.协调大型全国性电子健康记录(EHR)数据集内定量数据元素的单位和值。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1172-1182. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac054.
6
Changes in Iris Stiffness and Permeability in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.原发性闭角型青光眼患者房角变化与虹膜硬度及通透性的关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021 Oct 4;62(13):29. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.13.29.
7
The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review.SNOMED CT 的使用,2013-2020:文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):2017-2026. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab084.
8
Intraobserver and interobserver agreement among anterior chamber angle evaluations using automated 360-degree gonio-photos.使用自动化 360 度房角照相评估前房角时的观察者内和观察者间一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0251249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251249. eCollection 2021.
9
Predictive Analytics for Glaucoma Using Data From the All of Us Research Program.使用“我们所有人”研究计划的数据进行青光眼预测分析。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;227:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
10
Epidemiology of Glaucoma: The Past, Present, and Predictions for the Future.青光眼的流行病学:过去、现在及未来预测
Cureus. 2020 Nov 24;12(11):e11686. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11686.