Getzlaf Matthew A, Lewallen Eric A, Kremers Hilal M, Jones Dakota L, Bonin Carolina A, Dudakovic Amel, Thaler Roman, Cohen Robert C, Lewallen David G, van Wijnen Andre J
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
J Orthop Res. 2016 Feb;34(2):177-86. doi: 10.1002/jor.23068. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Like any foreign object, orthopaedic implants are susceptible to infection when introduced into the human body. Without additional preventative measures, the absolute number of annual prosthetic joint infections will continue to rise, and may exceed the capacity of health care systems in the near future. Bacteria are difficult to eradicate from synovial joints due to their exceptionally diverse taxonomy, complex mechanistic attachment capabilities, and tendency to evolve antibiotic resistance. When a primary orthopaedic implant fails from prosthetic joint infection, surgeons are generally challenged by limited options for intervention. In this review, we highlight the etiology and taxonomic groupings of bacteria known to cause prosthetic joint infections, and examine their key mechanisms of attachment. We propose that antimicrobial strategies should focus on the most harmful bacteria taxa within the context of occurrence, taxonomic diversity, adhesion mechanisms, and implant design. Patient-specific identification of organisms that cause prosthetic joint infections will permit assessment of their biological vulnerabilities. The latter can be targeted using a range of antimicrobial techniques that exploit different colonization mechanisms including implant surface attachment, biofilm formation, and/or hematogenous recruitment. We anticipate that customized strategies for each patient, joint, and prosthetic component will be most effective at reducing prosthetic joint infections, including those caused by antibiotic-resistant and polymicrobial bacteria.
与任何外来物体一样,骨科植入物进入人体后易受感染。如果不采取额外的预防措施,每年人工关节感染的绝对数量将持续上升,且在不久的将来可能会超出医疗系统的承受能力。由于细菌的分类极其多样、具有复杂的机械附着能力且易于产生抗生素耐药性,因此很难从滑膜关节中根除。当原发性骨科植入物因人工关节感染而失效时,外科医生通常面临有限的干预选择。在本综述中,我们强调了已知会导致人工关节感染的细菌的病因和分类,并研究了它们的关键附着机制。我们建议抗菌策略应根据发生情况、分类多样性、粘附机制和植入物设计,聚焦于最具危害性的细菌类别。针对导致人工关节感染的病原体进行患者特异性鉴定,将有助于评估其生物学脆弱性。利用包括植入物表面附着、生物膜形成和/或血行募集等不同定植机制的一系列抗菌技术,可以针对后者进行靶向治疗。我们预计,针对每位患者、每个关节和每个假体部件的定制策略,将最有效地减少人工关节感染,包括由耐抗生素细菌和多微生物细菌引起的感染。