Dzik Walter Sunny, Ziman Alyssa, Cohn Claudia, Pai Menaka, Lozano Miguel, Kaufman Richard M, Delaney Meghan, Selleng Kathleen, Murphy Michael F, Hervig Tor, Yazer Mark
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Transfusion Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Transfusion. 2016 Mar;56(3):558-63. doi: 10.1111/trf.13370. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
Information about patient survival after transfusion of multiple blood volumes is limited, and most reports have focused on trauma patients.
Retrospective study of blood use and survival at 11 hospitals in six nations between 2009 and 2013. Ultramassive transfusion (UMT) was defined as transfusion of 20 or more red blood cell (RBC) units over the course of any 2 consecutive calendar days.
A total of 1975 patients received UMT and a representative sample of 1360 patients was studied in detail. Patients were grouped into seven diagnostic categories: solid organ transplantation (n = 411), cardiac or major vascular surgery (n = 317), general surgery (n = 228), trauma (n = 221), general medicine (n = 124), obstetrics (n = 23), and other (n = 36). During the 7 days after initiation of UMT, these patients used more than 120,000 blood components. The median (interquartile range) blood use was 35 (26-50) RBC units, 30 (20-47) plasma units, and 7 (4-13) platelet doses. Five- and 30-day survival significantly declined with increasing RBC use. Overall survivals of patients receiving UMT were 71% (5 day) and 60% (30 day), and in the subset of 165 patients receiving 60 or more RBC units over 2 consecutive days, 5-day survival was 54% ranging from 17% (trauma) to 75% (solid organ transplant). The decline in survival with increasing RBC transfusions was minimal for patients undergoing solid organ transplantation and was most pronounced for trauma and nonsurgical bleeding patients.
Trauma was not the leading cause of UMT. Increasing RBC requirements were significantly associated with decreasing survival. However, survival was more strongly associated with diagnostic category than total RBCs transfused, with highest survival rates in solid organ transplant surgery.
关于输注多倍血量后患者生存情况的信息有限,且大多数报告都集中在创伤患者身上。
对2009年至2013年期间六个国家11家医院的用血情况和生存情况进行回顾性研究。超大量输血(UMT)定义为在任何连续两个日历日内输注20个或更多红细胞(RBC)单位。
共有1975例患者接受了超大量输血,对其中1360例患者的代表性样本进行了详细研究。患者被分为七个诊断类别:实体器官移植(n = 411)、心脏或大血管手术(n = 317)、普通外科手术(n = 228)、创伤(n = 221)、普通内科(n = 124)、产科(n = 23)和其他(n = 36)。在开始超大量输血后的7天内,这些患者使用了超过120,000个血液成分。血液使用的中位数(四分位间距)为35(26 - 50)个红细胞单位、30(20 - 47)个血浆单位和7(4 - 13)个血小板剂量。随着红细胞使用量的增加,5天和30天生存率显著下降。接受超大量输血患者的总体生存率为71%(5天)和60%(30天),在连续两天接受60个或更多红细胞单位的165例患者亚组中,5天生存率为54%,范围从17%(创伤)到75%(实体器官移植)。随着红细胞输注量的增加,生存率下降在实体器官移植患者中最小,在创伤和非手术出血患者中最为明显。
创伤不是超大量输血的主要原因。红细胞需求量的增加与生存率降低显著相关。然而,生存率与诊断类别比与输注的红细胞总数更密切相关,实体器官移植手术的生存率最高。