Chiu Elliott, Troyer Ryan M, Lappin Michael R, VandeWoude Sue
1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Feb;19(2):235-239. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15607586. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Objectives Several studies have reported that domestic cats can be naturally infected with bovine herpesvirus 4 (BHV4). Cats experimentally inoculated with BHV4 developed clinical signs involving the urinary tract, leading to the hypothesis that natural infection with BHV4 may be associated with feline lower urinary tract diseases. However, the question of whether BHV4 infection is common in cats remains equivocal. In this study, we sought to determine whether BHV4 is a common natural infection of domestic cats in the USA. Methods We used a sensitive nested PCR protocol specific to the BHV4 thymidine kinase gene to screen free-ranging domestic cat blood DNA samples (n = 101) collected from California, Colorado and Florida. Results Cats within this cohort were positive for seven other common pathogens of domestic cats, demonstrating the relatively high exposure of this population to endemic feline infections. In contrast, all domestic cat blood samples were negative for BHV4, while BHV4-containing tissue culture extracts were strongly positive. Conclusions and relevance BHV4 has been detected in tissues of latently infected cattle, though viral DNA is typically also detected in peripheral blood cells throughout infection. Our results suggest that persistent presence of BHV4 DNA in the blood of domestic cats is either rare or non-existent. We thus conclude that BHV4 is unlikely to be a major pathogen of cats.
目的 多项研究报告称家猫可自然感染牛疱疹病毒4型(BHV4)。用BHV4进行实验接种的猫出现了涉及泌尿道的临床症状,由此产生了一种假说,即BHV4的自然感染可能与猫下泌尿道疾病有关。然而,BHV4感染在猫中是否常见这一问题仍不明确。在本研究中,我们试图确定BHV4在美国家猫中是否为常见的自然感染源。方法 我们使用一种针对BHV4胸苷激酶基因的敏感巢式PCR方案,对从加利福尼亚州、科罗拉多州和佛罗里达州采集的101份自由放养的家猫血液DNA样本进行筛查。结果 该队列中的猫对家猫的其他七种常见病原体呈阳性反应,表明该群体相对较高地暴露于地方性猫科动物感染中。相比之下,所有家猫血液样本对BHV4均呈阴性,而含有BHV4的组织培养提取物呈强阳性。结论及意义 已在潜伏感染牛的组织中检测到BHV4,尽管在整个感染过程中通常也能在外周血细胞中检测到病毒DNA。我们的结果表明,BHV4 DNA在家猫血液中持续存在的情况要么罕见,要么不存在。因此,我们得出结论,BHV4不太可能是猫的主要病原体。